Newsgroups: can.politics,or.politics,seatttle.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Definitely A Foundation Failure
From: Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
Organization: ViperNews - www.vipernews.com
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 18:00:18 +0000
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in news:v3q1ek$118nu$3@dont-email.me:
> On 2024-06-05 08:35, Loran wrote:
>> Alan wrote:
>>> On 2024-06-04 08:02, Loran wrote:
>>>> Dhu on Gate wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:58:35 -0700, Alan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-06-01 07:53, Loran wrote:
>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>> No, they're not.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-make
>>>>>>> s-show-trial-conviction-ripe-for-reversal-legal-experts-say/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Come back when you're sober.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't be so thick.
>>>>>
>>>>> The entire US Legal Profession is Dreaming On
>>>>> the Apropos Weasel Werds to exonerate Drump.
>>>>>
>>>>> Havin' a Prez who owes ya' beats bein' one
>>>>> that owes ;-)Â Bet'er, he *knows* how to beat
>>>>> that game an' they'll lose their shirts bein'
>>>>> ow'ed by 'im.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dhu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> They have even worse planned, because they want ALL control, not
>>>> just the pResidency:
>>>>
>>>> https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.wa
>>>> shingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/06/02/alito-letter-flags-controversy/
>>>>
>>>> Finally, the recommendations above, if unsuccessful in curbing the
>>>> courtâs arrogance, would set the stage for wholesale court
>>>> reform. Should Democrats win the White House and majorities in the
>>>> House and Senate, no matter how narrow, the entire panoply of
>>>> reforms and responses should be on the table. Those could include
>>>> Alitoâs impeachment (especially if he snubs a subpoena), a
>>>> mandatory ethics code, Supreme Court term limits and court
>>>> expansion. (If need be, Democrats would need to adjust the too-long
>>>> abused filibuster to attend to the job of fixing a disgraced
>>>> court.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FASCISM!!!!
>>>
>>> A "mandatory ethics code" is "FASCISM!!!!"
>>
>> You got it, yes.
>>
>> WHO's minding the hen house when the Dems start eating liberty.
>
> "eating liberty" is refusing to even give a nomination hearing to a
> presidential supreme court nominee because a year is too close to an
> election...
>
> ...and then nominating and ratifying someone ONE MONTH before the next
> election.
Republicans stalled the Garland
nomination for a whole year but sped
thru the Barrent pick bofore Ginsburg
had even been buried.
Shameless. Absolutely shameless.