From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,or.politics,seatttle.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Definitely A Foundation Failure
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:14:26 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-06-05 08:55, Loran wrote:
> Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-06-05 08:35, Loran wrote:
>>> Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2024-06-04 08:02, Loran wrote:
>>>>> Dhu on Gate wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:58:35 -0700, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2024-06-01 07:53, Loran wrote:
>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> No, they're not.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/31/intentional-misfeasance-makes-show-trial-conviction-ripe-for-reversal-legal-experts-say/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Come back when you're sober.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't be so thick.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The entire US Legal Profession is Dreaming On
>>>>>> the Apropos Weasel Werds to exonerate Drump.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Havin' a Prez who owes ya' beats bein' one
>>>>>> that owes ;-)Â Bet'er, he *knows* how to beat
>>>>>> that game an' they'll lose their shirts bein'
>>>>>> ow'ed by 'im.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dhu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> They have even worse planned, because they want ALL control, not
>>>>> just the pResidency:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/06/02/alito-letter-flags-controversy/
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, the recommendations above, if unsuccessful in curbing the
>>>>> courtâs arrogance, would set the stage for wholesale court reform.
>>>>> Should Democrats win the White House and majorities in the House
>>>>> and Senate, no matter how narrow, the entire panoply of reforms and
>>>>> responses should be on the table. Those could include Alitoâs
>>>>> impeachment (especially if he snubs a subpoena), a mandatory ethics
>>>>> code, Supreme Court term limits and court expansion. (If need be,
>>>>> Democrats would need to adjust the too-long abused filibuster to
>>>>> attend to the job of fixing a disgraced court.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> FASCISM!!!!
>>>>
>>>> A "mandatory ethics code" is "FASCISM!!!!"
>>>
>>> You got it, yes.
>>>
>>> WHO's minding the hen house when the Dems start eating liberty.
>>
>> "eating liberty"
>
> Yep.
>
> Chilling the SCOTUS and trying to make Justices recuse themselves to
> serve partisan leftard spite.
You don't think a judge should recuse himself from cases related to
events in which his wife was a participant?
You don't think a judge who takes huge bribes should be removed from the
bench, nevermind recusal?