From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.global-warming,alt.politics
Subject: Re: Wind Turbine Foundation Failure
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:16:39 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-06-05 10:20, Loran wrote:
> Dhu on Gate wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 11:24:58 -0700, Alan wrote:
>>
>>> On 2024-05-28 22:24, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Netherlands: When conducting a life cycle assessment of a wind
>>>> turbine, or any other product, researchers
>>>> begin by diagramming each stage of its existence, from manufacturing
>>>> through end-of-life disposal.
>>>>
>>>> This wind turbine didn't do so well, it didn't freeze up or catch on
>>>> fire, it blew over... from the wind.
>>>>
>>>> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1795322848283885568/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/YRMG79-Fu6CkN_Et.mp4?tag=12
>>>>
>>>> https://i.imgur.com/ckg40xl.jpeg
>>>
>>> So just so we're all clear...
>>>
>>> ...what with the losers trying to deflect...
>>>
>>> ...the claim that this was a foundation failure was pure bullshit.
>>>
>>> :-)
>>
>> Oh? An' yer the EXPURT we're sposed to believe? Tell us about
>> your credentials as an Engineer/Physicist or mebbe just provide
>> some credible evidence for your claims.
>>
>> Dhu
>>
>>
> Plus a failure is a failure regardless of where on the tower it occurs.
But the argument was about how long and how costly repairing the failure
would be.
>
> See: Texas ice storm failures.
Where natural gas failures were much larger than the wind failures...