From: Loran <loran@invalid.net>
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Wind Turbine Foundation Failure
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:50:16 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Dhu on Gate wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:20:52 -0600, Loran wrote:
>
>> Dhu on Gate wrote:
>>> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 11:24:58 -0700, Alan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-05-28 22:24, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Netherlands: When conducting a life cycle assessment of a wind turbine, or any other product, researchers
>>>>> begin by diagramming each stage of its existence, from manufacturing through end-of-life disposal.
>>>>>
>>>>> This wind turbine didn't do so well, it didn't freeze up or catch on fire, it blew over... from the wind.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1795322848283885568/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/YRMG79-Fu6CkN_Et.mp4?tag=12
>>>>>
>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/ckg40xl.jpeg
>>>>
>>>> So just so we're all clear...
>>>>
>>>> ...what with the losers trying to deflect...
>>>>
>>>> ...the claim that this was a foundation failure was pure bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Oh? An' yer the EXPURT we're sposed to believe? Tell us about
>>> your credentials as an Engineer/Physicist or mebbe just provide
>>> some credible evidence for your claims.
>>>
>>> Dhu
>>>
>>>
>> Plus a failure is a failure regardless of where on the tower it occurs.
>>
>> See: Texas ice storm failures.
>>
>
> This
>
>> This obfuscatory argumentation is the systematic use of attachment
>> minutiae to deny the severity of the failure.
>
> is an accurate description of most of Alan's arguments; and
> a lot of other systemic idiots hereabouts as well.
>
> Dhu
TY
>>
>> They can't deny the downed turbines, so they mince words over:
>>
>> @ How many failed
>> @ Which components failed
>> @ What % of the power supply the constitute
>>
>> ...and on and on and on...
>>
>> Alan took the bolt bait because he was quick to want some easy denial to
>> harp on.
>>
>> But he fails to realize that was put in his lap for just that reason
>> alone - to demonstrate his lack of concern for the overall failures, but
>> rather his fealty to complete denialism.
>>
>> As such he has been hook,line, and sinker'd.
>>
>> A denial bot is more easily dismissed when it's identified with hooked
>> bait in its mouth.
How do you manage to remain sane here in this cauldron of failed
rhetorical flourishes and outright craven deceit and denial?
:-O