From: Dhu on Gate <campbell@neotext.ca>
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Wind Turbine Foundation Failure
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:31:25 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:50:16 -0600, Loran wrote:
> Dhu on Gate wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:20:52 -0600, Loran wrote:
>>
>>> Dhu on Gate wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 11:24:58 -0700, Alan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2024-05-28 22:24, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Netherlands: When conducting a life cycle assessment of a wind turbine, or any other product, researchers
>>>>>> begin by diagramming each stage of its existence, from manufacturing through end-of-life disposal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This wind turbine didn't do so well, it didn't freeze up or catch on fire, it blew over... from the wind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1795322848283885568/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/YRMG79-Fu6CkN_Et.mp4?tag=12
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/ckg40xl.jpeg
>>>>>
>>>>> So just so we're all clear...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...what with the losers trying to deflect...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...the claim that this was a foundation failure was pure bullshit.
>>>>>
>>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> Oh? An' yer the EXPURT we're sposed to believe? Tell us about
>>>> your credentials as an Engineer/Physicist or mebbe just provide
>>>> some credible evidence for your claims.
>>>>
>>>> Dhu
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Plus a failure is a failure regardless of where on the tower it occurs.
>>>
>>> See: Texas ice storm failures.
>>>
>>
>> This
>>
>>> This obfuscatory argumentation is the systematic use of attachment
>>> minutiae to deny the severity of the failure.
>>
>> is an accurate description of most of Alan's arguments; and
>> a lot of other systemic idiots hereabouts as well.
>>
>> Dhu
>
> TY
>
>>>
>>> They can't deny the downed turbines, so they mince words over:
>>>
>>> @ How many failed
>>> @ Which components failed
>>> @ What % of the power supply the constitute
>>>
>>> ...and on and on and on...
>>>
>>> Alan took the bolt bait because he was quick to want some easy denial to
>>> harp on.
>>>
>>> But he fails to realize that was put in his lap for just that reason
>>> alone - to demonstrate his lack of concern for the overall failures, but
>>> rather his fealty to complete denialism.
>>>
>>> As such he has been hook,line, and sinker'd.
>>>
>>> A denial bot is more easily dismissed when it's identified with hooked
>>> bait in its mouth.
>
> How do you manage to remain sane here in this cauldron of failed
> rhetorical flourishes and outright craven deceit and denial?
>
> :-O
I pray a lot and look for H* truth in the words and doings of other folks:
"wherever two or three ..."
Dhu
--
Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglais.
C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)
Duncan Patton a Campbell