From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: If You Could Reason With Climate Alarmists...
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:10:59 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
... there wouldn't BE any climate alarmists.
=============================================================================
Climate Change Explains EVERYTHING!
Climate Change makes for shorter winters, except for when it makes for longer
winters.
Climate Change means less snow, except for when Climate Change means more snow.
And Climate Change causes droughts in California and floods in Texas and
Oklahoma and generally makes wet places wetter and dry places dryer, except
when it makes wet places drier and dry places wetter, except when none of that
changes at all, and then Climate Change explains that too!
And Climate Change causes more hurricanes at the same time as it causes less
hurricanes.
Climate Change causes more rain but less water... and less rain but more water?
And Climate Change causes more water vapour in the atmosphere, at the same time
it causes less rain... and less water vapour in the atmosphere, when it causes
MORE rain?
Climate Change decreases the spread of malaria at the same time as it increases
the spread of malaria.
Climate Change makes San Francisco foggier... Climate Change makes San
Francisco less foggy.
Climate Change causes duller autumn leaves... Climate Change causes shinier
autumn leaves.
Climate Change makes for less salty seas... Climate Change makes for saltier
seas.
Climate Change causes the polar ice caps to melt... Climate Change also causes
the polar ice caps to freeze.
Climate Change makes the Earth hotter, unless the Earth isn't getting hotter...
in which case, Climate Change can explain that too.
What's the problem here? This sounds like the perfect scientific theory. It can
explain literally everything including self contradictory things.
This means it's absolutely perfect, doesn't it?
Well no, not according to Karl Popper and the philosophers of science and
within the philosophy of science there's something called the demarcation
problem... how do you differentiate science from pseudo-science?
The left won't LET you, and brands you a denierrrrrrr(whining).