From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats.d,or.politics,talk.politics.guns,seattle.politics,can.politics
Subject: Re: Nixon's pardon
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:58:33 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 6/11/2024 7:42 AM, spammy, involuntarily retired fuckdrip, lied:
> On 6/10/2024 5:07 PM, J Carlson wrote:
>> On 6/10/2024 4:49 PM, spammy, involuntarily retired fuckdrip, lied:
>>> On 6/10/2024 4:45 PM, J Carlson wrote:
>>>> On 6/10/2024 3:09 PM, spammy, involuntarily retired fuckdrip, lied:
>>>>> On 6/10/2024 11:19 AM, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 10:49 AM, spammy, involuntarily retired fuckdrip, lied:
>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 10:47 AM, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 10:36 AM, spammy, involuntarily retired fuckdrip, lied:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 11:29 AM, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 10:21 AM, spammy, involuntarily retired fuckdrip, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 9:51 AM, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 9:29 AM, spammy, involuntarily retired fuckdrip, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 9:17 AM, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 9:13 AM, spammy, involuntarily retired fuckdrip, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 8:48 AM, J Carlson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/10/2024 8:25 AM, spammy, involuntarily retired fuckdrip, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J Carlson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In United States v. Wilson (1833), the U.S. Supreme Court held
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that a pardon can be rejected *by the intended recipient*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exactly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And who in his right mind is going to do that?!?!?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Someone who doesn't want to labor under the imputation of guilt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lorance, for example.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coward tRudey will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non sequitur
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coward tRudey will
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> non sequitur
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why did you come back, spammy? You were away from here for years. Now
>>>>>>>>>>>> you're posting all fucking day long. Were you involuntarily retired
>>>>>>>>>>>> from your wage-slave job as AlleyPussyBitch was?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What happened to your failed gig at Solar city, little man Ball?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No such poster here, as you well know, spammy, and I've never heard of
>>>>>>>>>> anything called "Solar City"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Answer the questions, spammy, you little squat-to-piss fuckdrip: why
>>>>>>>>>> did you come back here after a years-long absence? And why were you
>>>>>>>>>> *forced* into retirement?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The dwarf who
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why were you involuntarily retired, spammy?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why were you involuntarily retired, spammy, you little squat-to-piss fuckdrip?
>>>>>
>>>>> Spit and seethe, little man Ball.
>>>>
>>>> No such poster here, as you well know.
>>>>
>>>> Why were you involuntarily retired, spammy, you little squat-to-piss fuckdrip?
>>>
>>> Not on
>>
>> non sequitur
>>
>> Why were you involuntarily retired, spammy, you little squat-to-piss fuckdrip?
>
> Where's your
non sequitur
Why were you involuntarily retired, spammy, you little squat-to-piss fuckdrip?
Thanks for the tacit admission that you *were*, just like AlleyPussyBitch.