Davin News Server

From: Loran <loran@invalid.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Why Can't Pansy-Ass Pussy Liberals Stop Lying
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:24:05 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

Alan wrote:
> On 2024-06-17 07:28, Loran wrote:
>> Alan wrote:
>>> Felonies were what the jury found him guilty of
>>
>> EXPIRED 5 year statute of limitations, Canuckleheaded shitbag!
> 
> Ummmmmm... ...nope!

Fact.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/06/05/trump-case-statute-of-limitations-explained/73983592007/

Trump has said he plans to appeal his conviction, and his lawyer has 
mentioned the statute of limitations as one issue that could be raised.
A felony in New York normally must be charged within 5 years of the crime...

Trump criticized Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over the more than 
six-week trial, and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought 
the charges against the former president. But he also also questioned 
the timing of the prosecution.

"They missed the statute of limitations by a lot because this was very 
old," he said. "They could have brought this seven years ago instead of 
bringing it right in the middle of the election. So they missed the 
statute of limitations."

Context from 2020:

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/11/trump-federal-tax-prosecution-statute-of-limitations.html

Legal analysts discussing Trump’s criminal exposure after leaving office 
often note that the statute of limitations for a federal criminal 
offense is usually five years. That means that if Trump committed some 
sort of crime that ended in 2016 when he won election, he would need to 
be indicted in 2021; if he committed a crime that ended in 2017, his 
first year in office, that case would need to be filed by 2022; and so 
on. This is a significant limitation on any investigation of Trump, 
since even under the best circumstances, it can take years for the 
government to fully investigate a complex criminal case. And of course, 
Trump has been in office for the past four years with no sign that 
anyone at the Justice Department—besides special counsel Robert Mueller 
and his team’s Russia probe, which turned up evidence that Trump 
committed obstruction of justice and resulted in a handful of successful 
prosecutions of Trump underlings—has closely scrutinized any of his many 
questionable dealings during and before his presidency. (There has been 
much speculation that Trump might engineer a self-pardon before leaving 
office, but the legality of such a maneuver would at best be highly 
debatable.)

As the U.S. Supreme Court has explained, these statutes of limitations 
serve important constitutional, legislative, and policy interests. Among 
other things, the passage of time poses the very real risk that 
exculpatory evidence favorable to a defendant will be lost. In 
white-collar cases, this means not just that memories may fade, but 
important written communications can be lost, and potentially crucial 
financial data can get deleted or overwritten in the course of business.