Davin News Server

From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Biden: Cain't Get Shit Right - Part Unn
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:58:07 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On 2024-06-27 11:41, Ken wrote:
> pothead wrote:
>> On 2024-06-21, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>> On 2024-06-21 07:09, pothead wrote:
>>>> On 2024-06-21, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-06-20 22:08, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 20:10:18 -0700,  Alan says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But a speech impediment
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show us that impediment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying that Biden hasn't struggled with stuttering all his 
>>>>> life,
>>>>> Loser?
>>>>
>>>> There is a difference between stuttering and extreme cognitive failure.
>>>
>>> There is...
>>>
>>> ...but you aren't qualified to determine which is which.
>>
>> LOL !
>>
>>
>> Wandering around glassy eyed, confused, shaking hands with invisible 
>> people, not knowing the name
>> of Secretary of Homeland Security is when he is standing right next to 
>> you,
>> mixing up the president of Ukraine with Vladimir Putin, confusing NATO 
>> with Ukraine, mistaking
>> Mexico for Egypt, confusing Macon with Mitterand who has been dead 
>> since 1997, forgetting the name
>> of Hamas, mixing up the Iraq war with the ongoing war in Ukraine, 
>> confusing the All Blacks with the
>> Black and Tans in Ireland, falling asleep at the COP26 in November 
>> 2021 ARE NOT EXAMPLES OF A
>> stuttering SPEECH IMPEDIMENT.
>>
>> And that just scratches the surface of a man in the latter stages of 
>> some type of cognitive failure.
>>
>> If Joe Biden simply suffers from a speech impediment, why not release 
>> the audio tapes from the Hur
>> investigation?
>> Hmmmm.
> 
> The only problem I know that Joe has had "all his life", is telling the 
> truth.  Recently an interviewer on TV asked "What job would anyone hire 
> Joe Biden for?  It is one I have asked myself many times, and my reply 
> is:  I would not hire him to rake leaves!!  How anyone who voted for him 
> 4 years ago could seriously be considering doing so again, is beyond me.

But you'd hire the guy who thinks it's feasible to rake leaves in all 
the forests of the USA to prevent forest fires?