From: Chips Loral <loralandclinton@invalid.co>
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: OT: "Don't dignify it with a REFUTTAL"
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:04:25 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Alan wrote:
> On 2024-06-27 16:12, Chips Loral wrote:
>> Alan wrote:
>>> On 2024-06-27 15:44, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-06-27 13:26, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-06-26 15:58, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> <https://x.com/i/status/1806036831160717709>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's see how you do with a distant teleprompter at age 78,
>>>>>>>> shall we?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You think the teleprompter had "refuttal" on it, Loser-2?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You think stumbling over a word you can't see properly leads to
>>>>>> perfect pronunciation?
>>>>>
>>>>> You think an ordinary person sees something on a teleprompter that
>>>>> they can't quite read and just blurts out a NON-word, loser-2?
>>>>>
>>>>> LOLOLOLOLLOLOLL
>>>>
>>>> Why yes, it's called...sounding it out...sometimes you're half way
>>>> through before knowing you're wrong.
>>>
>>> You think educated people reading a sentence where the word
>>> "rebuttal" is expected have to sound it out?
>>
>> At a distance with sun glare, who knows what it might look like.
>
> But somehow the rest of the sentence was not problem to read?
Stumbles are like that, unless you're Xiden:
https://youtu.be/rwjmyZUA2O8
https://youtu.be/QbQ_8jmBxTk
https://youtu.be/dSm7bjGjEwM