From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: OT: "Don't dignify it with a REFUTTAL"
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:52:04 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-06-28 15:04, Chips Loral wrote:
> Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-06-27 16:12, Chips Loral wrote:
>>> Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2024-06-27 15:44, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-06-27 13:26, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-26 15:58, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> <https://x.com/i/status/1806036831160717709>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let's see how you do with a distant teleprompter at age 78,
>>>>>>>>> shall we?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You think the teleprompter had "refuttal" on it, Loser-2?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You think stumbling over a word you can't see properly leads to
>>>>>>> perfect pronunciation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You think an ordinary person sees something on a teleprompter that
>>>>>> they can't quite read and just blurts out a NON-word, loser-2?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOLOLOLOLLOLOLL
>>>>>
>>>>> Why yes, it's called...sounding it out...sometimes you're half way
>>>>> through before knowing you're wrong.
>>>>
>>>> You think educated people reading a sentence where the word
>>>> "rebuttal" is expected have to sound it out?
>>>
>>> At a distance with sun glare, who knows what it might look like.
>>
>> But somehow the rest of the sentence was not problem to read?
>
> Stumbles are like that, unless you're Xiden:
No. They're not at all like that.