From: Chips Loral <loralandclinton@invalid.co>
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: OT: "Don't dignify it with a REFUTTAL"
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:46:20 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Alan wrote:
> On 2024-06-28 15:04, Chips Loral wrote:
>> Alan wrote:
>>> On 2024-06-27 16:12, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-06-27 15:44, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-06-27 13:26, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-26 15:58, Chips Loral wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://x.com/i/status/1806036831160717709>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let's see how you do with a distant teleprompter at age 78,
>>>>>>>>>> shall we?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You think the teleprompter had "refuttal" on it, Loser-2?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You think stumbling over a word you can't see properly leads to
>>>>>>>> perfect pronunciation?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You think an ordinary person sees something on a teleprompter
>>>>>>> that they can't quite read and just blurts out a NON-word, loser-2?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOLOLOLOLLOLOLL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why yes, it's called...sounding it out...sometimes you're half way
>>>>>> through before knowing you're wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> You think educated people reading a sentence where the word
>>>>> "rebuttal" is expected have to sound it out?
>>>>
>>>> At a distance with sun glare, who knows what it might look like.
>>>
>>> But somehow the rest of the sentence was not problem to read?
>>
>> Stumbles are like that, unless you're Xiden:
>
> No. They're not at all like that.
>
Your credibility on stumbles is as in the dirt as Xiden's face.