Davin News Server

On 2024-08-19 19:37, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <cau7cjl45gj3lrbhfksp44fkklnrh4eei7@4ax.com>,
> governor.swill@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:51:36 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <va0hcs$31uon$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-08-19 15:31, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <va037t$2vijj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-08-19 04:09, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 16:01:30 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-08-18 07:32, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 08:55:30 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-08-17 06:17, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:12:54 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-08-16 09:44, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:11:56 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-08-14 04:24, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:10:40 -0600, Chips Loral
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <loralandclinton@invalid.co> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Walz is a "Command Sergeant Major, Retired".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Period.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In your own home, on your own front porch, watching the gestapo sweep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the otherwise peaceful and empty neighborhood streets when:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://x.com/Bubblebathgirl/status/1823207131769643490
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gov. Tim Walz had his police use paintball guns to shoot Minnesota
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> residents if they broke curfew by being on their porches during CoViD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Get in the house!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Light 'em up!"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That right there is as bad as Cruella Whitmer's fascism, and even a step
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> farther to complete Orwelian destruction of rights.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? ? ??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fun to watch all the libs like "Alan" blatantly lie about reality.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What am I supposed to be lying about?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Was Walz promoted to CSM? Yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When he retired did he hold that rank? Yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The Harris campaign website identified him that way until Wednesday
>>>>>>>>>>>>> afternoon. It now says that Walz served in the Army, "rising to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rank of Command Sergeant Major."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's because although Walz did hold the title at one point, he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> retired as a master sergeant, a lower rank. The Army reduced his rank
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in May 2005, when Walz retired, because he never finished the required
>>>>>>>>>>>>> coursework for the US Army Sergeants Major Academy, according to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minnesota National Guard records.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To retire as a command sergeant major, Walz would also have had to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hold the title for three years."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote that, and what were her qualifications for making that
>>>>>>>>>>>> statement? It wasn't a quote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Does it really matter?  This is the official campaign position and
>>>>>>>>>>> Waltz is not objecting.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.businessinsider.com/tim-walz-military-career-what-we-know-fact-check-2024-8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you hold the title "at one point", you're entitled to that rank when
>>>>>>>>>>>> you retire.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> '10 U.S. Code § 8336 - Highest grade held satisfactorily: Reserve
>>>>>>>>>>>> enlisted members reduced in grade not as a result of the member?s
>>>>>>>>>>>> misconduct'
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/8336>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest you read it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He did not complete the mandatory courses for the rank, therefore he
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't hold that rank.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Produce the regulation or law that supports that claim.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Interesting that you disregard what is put in front of you and stamp
>>>>>>>>> your feet for more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I quoted the salient portion of the law.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When challenged to do your part, you punk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ask the national guard.  They seem more informed than you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're the one making claims about what they said...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...but failing to provide quotes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Look it up you lazy fuck.
>>>>
>>>> The lazy fuck is the one who claims something exists...
>>>>
>>>> ...but won't back it up.
>>>
>>> I didn't make the claim.
>>
>> You interjected yourself into the conversation in support of the poster who did.
> 
> So?
>>
>> You are now responsible.
>>
> I do as I please.

Where did anyone say anything that contradicts that?