Davin News Server

From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Walz Just Broke Federal Law
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 06:59:22 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 07:07:56 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:50:08 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2024-08-19 04:00, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:20:23 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2024-08-18 21:01, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 15:59:28 -0700,  Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, stupid... why did they "bust" him down to E-8 Master sergeant?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Doesn't matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes... it does matter. He's passing himself off AS a retired CSM, and he is NOT one.
>>>>
>>>> That is literally the rank listed on his retirement form
>>>>
>>>>>    
>>>>>> The highest grade he held was CSM and it wasn't misconduct.
>>>>>
>>>>> STILL not the topic, and NO ONE said it was because of misconduct.
>>>>
>>>> Then if it's not misconduct, the law is clear.
>>>>
>>>> He is entitled BY LAW to call himself a CSM.
>>>>>
>>> 
>>> Not according to the national guard.  Who is more informed?
>>
>>Quote them saying that.
>>
>>I've quoted the actual US LAW.
>
>Then tell us why the Harris campaign had to change the language on
>their website?
>
>"Regardless, Walz served for seven months as command sergeant major.
>When he decided to retire, he left without completing that training.
>As a result, his official retirement rank is a step lower. The
>demotion occurred after he left, and it was administrative, not
>punitive. The change primarily affects Walz's military-retirement
>package.
>
>The Minnesota National Guard has regularly stated that it is
>appropriate for Walz to say he "served as" command sergeant major.
>Capt. Holly Rockow, a public affairs officer for the Minnesota
>National Guard, told Minnesota Public Radio in 2018 that it "is
>legitimate for Walz to say he served as a command sergeant major."
>
>Walz's opponents take umbrage with Walz saying he is a retired command
>sergeant major due to this demotion. On Aug. 8, 2024, the Harris
>campaign, which had originally described Walz as a "retired command
>sergeant major" on its website, changed the language to more
>accurately state that he served at the rank of command sergeant
>major."
>
>https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/08/12/walz-military-service/

And Alan runs away.