Davin News Server

From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Biden Climate Policy Is a Fraud
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 16:21:49 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.


Biden Climate Policy Is a Fraud

A new study examines global climate efforts and says green pork barrel has no impact on emissions.

Even Democrats don't want to hear about climate change. The words were barely mentioned at the convention, 
and every transcript I examined omitted the once obligatory Biden modifier "existential."

The reason isn't a mystery. Joe Biden's policies are having not the slightest effect on climate change and 
yet somebody will still have to pay Ford's $130,000 in losses per electric vehicle in the first quarter. This 
sum, a calculation shows, is equal to $64.80 per gallon of gasoline saved over four years of average driving. 
And yes, this amounts to a ludicrously costly subsidy to somebody else to use the gasoline that EV drivers 
are paid to forgo.

VoilĂ , the flaw in the Biden strategy from the get-go, which completely defeats the goal of reducing 
emissions.

Regular readers may feel vindicated by a new study this week in the prestigious journal Science. It examines 
1,500 "climate" policies adopted around the world and finds only 63-or 4%-produced any emissions reductions. 
Even so, press accounts strained to muddy the study's simple lesson so let's spell it out: Taxing carbon 
reduces emissions. Subsidizing "green energy" doesn't.

In fact, this should be old hat. One of the most cited papers in climate economics is 2012's "Do alternative 
energy sources displace fossil fuels?" by the University of Oregon's Richard York. His answer: not "when net 
effects are considered."

Mr. York and a colleague returned with a 2019 empirical paper showing that while "renewable energy sources 
compose a larger share of overall energy production, they are not replacing fossil fuels but are rather 
expanding the overall amount of energy that is produced."

This result can't really surprise the Obama-Biden Democrats, who sponsored a 2013 National Research Council 
study of their own, led by a future Nobel Prize winner no less. For similar reasons, the author didn't mince 
words, concluding that green subsidies were a "poor tool for reducing greenhouse gases and achieving climate-
change objectives."

Yet this poor strategy Mr. Biden would later quadruple down on with upward of $1 trillion in taxpayer and 
energy consumer money.

I won't rehearse the official lying that went into selling this folly, especially in the form of Mr. Biden's 
laughably named Inflation Reduction Act. But nothing in presidential memory resembles Mr. Biden's record of 
exceptionally foolish choices in office.

You know the litany: the second Covid spendathon that caused 9% inflation, the border collapse, the 
Afghanistan withdrawal, his attempt to appease Vladimir Putin after lying about a Russian connection to 
Hunter Biden's laptop.

Mr. Biden's green-energy strategy was wrongheaded by every bit of economic advice, with nothing to show now 
except billions added to the deficit and a budding disaster from forcing Detroit to build EVs the public 
doesn't want.

So let us welcome the new Science magazine study. "Backfire" was a term already turning up in the economics 
literature for policies that claim to reduce emissions but actually increase them.

Green-energy subsidies, in the first instance, subsidize extra fossil-fuel consumption to produce battery 
minerals, wind turbines and solar panels. U.S. policies particularly incentivize oversize SUVs whose net 
emissions are greater than any gasoline-fueled miles they could possibly displace.

When Washington spends hundreds of billions to lure some drivers to use EVs, guess what? It ends up making 
gasoline cheaper and more available for other consumers around the world to use.

The 2023 data have arrived. Fossil-fuel use, emissions and green energy all have grown right alongside each 
other, as economics predicted. Global emissions finally broke the 40 gigaton threshold, having doubled since 
1984.

A few years ago the United Nations climate panel dropped its once-standard emissions scenario RCP 8.5 as 
unduly pessimistic. It may have to be revived. RCP 8.5 was a model of emissions under systematically bad 
global economic policies, such as Mr. Biden's green-energy trade wars and industrial pork barrel, that 
inhibit the global economy's quest for energy efficiency.

Obama handler David Axelrod ventured on CNN this week that the Democratic convention had turned out to be a 
"values-laden" affair, short on "policy specifics."

This understates how thoroughly the convention left voters having to guess how Kamala Harris will act on a 
myriad of issues. Their only guide is apparently that she doesn't kick puppies and Donald Trump does.

Every scintilla suggests Ms. Harris nevertheless would bring better natural judgment than Mr. Biden. But 
because she, like America, has been swathed in the New York Times's unanalytical, uncritical cheerleading, 
she will still likely be dumbfounded to learn the truth about Biden climate policies.

Perhaps we should say "if" she chooses to hear the truth. Because there's a good chance she will keep 
throwing your money and mine on the pyre to avoid admitting a mistake.

=====

August:

Rare August Chill Breaks Decades-Old Records

Rare August Snow For The Sierra Nevada

The Atlantic's Rapid Cooling

Heavy Snow Hits New Zealand's South Island

Record Summer Chills Sweep The Great Lakes, Northeast, and Southern Canada

Where Are The Hurricanes? Another Crushing Defeat For Team Climate Change

Antarctica Registers -75.5C (-103.9F), Sea Ice Surges

Winter Far From Over In New Zealand

Historical "Heatwave Days" Show No Trend

Researchers Pumped Extra CO2 Into A Forest, And Biodiversity Thrived

Low Temperature Records Fall In U.S.

Frosts Persist In South America, Impacting Coffee Prices

Island Nations Like Tuvalu: Growing, Not Sinking

Record Cold Sweeps Brazil

Antarctica Back Below -70C (-94F)

Summer Snowfall at Khardungla Pass

Polar Bear And Arctic Sea Ice Lies Persist

Polar Fronts To Hit South America

Antarctic Sea Ice Extent Gains 1 Million Km2 In A Week

Frigid Winter Forecast For NH

Vast Cold Wave About To Sweep The U.S.
Greek Study Challenges CO2-Temperature Causality
Arctic Shipping Season Is Shortening
Rapid Antarctic Sea Ice Growth
Heavy Snow Hits New Zealand
Too Many Polar Bears In Greenland
British Farmers Paid To NOT Produce Food
Record July Cold Hits Scotland
Summer To Quit Early This Year
Remarkable Summer Gains On The Greenland Ice Sheet
Arctic Sea Ice Extent: No Cause For Alarm
$78 Trillion To Fight The Hoax of 'Climate Crisis'