From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton, A Serial Sexual Predator And The Man Who Raped Me
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:12:48 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-08-26 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vaitn3$2k9p2$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-08-26 14:47, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:11:08 -0700, Alan says...
>>>
>>>>> Not guilty. No rape charges.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So then you'll apply that same standard to Clinton, right?
>>>
>>> Take him to trial and you'll see the difference.
>>>
>>> The women he "allegedly" raped, will have a LOT more to say than the fruitcake E. Jean Carroll.
>>>
>>> No rape.
>>>
>>> No sexual assault.
>>>
>>> Liable.
>>
>> Found to have sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll.
>>
>> But somehow, that isn't enough proof, when no testimony under oath at
>> all is sufficient in the other case.
>
> Still no rape. None.
Found to have committed rape after a trial by jury.