From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton, A Serial Sexual Predator And The Man Who Raped Me
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:24:00 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-08-26 16:53, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vaj25g$2ksk7$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-08-26 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vaitn3$2k9p2$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-08-26 14:47, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:11:08 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not guilty. No rape charges.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So then you'll apply that same standard to Clinton, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Take him to trial and you'll see the difference.
>>>>>
>>>>> The women he "allegedly" raped, will have a LOT more to say than the fruitcake E. Jean Carroll.
>>>>>
>>>>> No rape.
>>>>>
>>>>> No sexual assault.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liable.
>>>>
>>>> Found to have sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll.
>>>>
>>>> But somehow, that isn't enough proof, when no testimony under oath at
>>>> all is sufficient in the other case.
>>>
>>> Still no rape. None.
>>
>> Found to have committed rape after a trial by jury.
>
> After a trial? Only cheaters would do something like that. Why isn't he
> in jail?
Because it was a civil trial.
But it was still a trial and the jury still found as a matter of FACT
that he had committed sexual assault.