From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton, A Serial Sexual Predator And The Man Who Raped Me In 1978, Will Be The Guest Speaker At The DNC Tonight. - Juanita Broaddrick
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:28:56 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vaj6b0$2lmgd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-08-26 16:53, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vaj25g$2ksk7$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-08-26 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vaitn3$2k9p2$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-08-26 14:47, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:11:08 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Not guilty. No rape charges.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So then you'll apply that same standard to Clinton, right?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Take him to trial and you'll see the difference.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The women he "allegedly" raped, will have a LOT more to say than the fruitcake E. Jean Carroll.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No rape.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No sexual assault.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Liable.
> >>>>
> >>>> Found to have sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll.
> >>>>
> >>>> But somehow, that isn't enough proof, when no testimony under oath at
> >>>> all is sufficient in the other case.
> >>>
> >>> Still no rape. None.
> >>
> >> Found to have committed rape after a trial by jury.
> >
> > After a trial? Only cheaters would do something like that. Why isn't he
> > in jail?
>
> Because it was a civil trial.
>
> But it was still a trial and the jury still found as a matter of FACT
> that he had committed sexual assault.
But not rape.