From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton, A Serial Sexual Predator And The Man Who Raped Me In 1978, Will Be The Guest Speaker At The DNC Tonight. - Juanita Broaddrick
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:35:51 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-08-26 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vaj7qf$2ls6u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-08-26 17:28, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vaj6b0$2lmgd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-08-26 16:53, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vaj25g$2ksk7$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-08-26 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vaitn3$2k9p2$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-08-26 14:47, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:11:08 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Not guilty. No rape charges.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So then you'll apply that same standard to Clinton, right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Take him to trial and you'll see the difference.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The women he "allegedly" raped, will have a LOT more to say than the fruitcake E. Jean Carroll.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No rape.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No sexual assault.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Liable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Found to have sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But somehow, that isn't enough proof, when no testimony under oath at
>>>>>>>> all is sufficient in the other case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still no rape. None.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Found to have committed rape after a trial by jury.
>>>>>
>>>>> After a trial? Only cheaters would do something like that. Why isn't he
>>>>> in jail?
>>>>
>>>> Because it was a civil trial.
>>>>
>>>> But it was still a trial and the jury still found as a matter of FACT
>>>> that he had committed sexual assault.
>>>
>>> But not rape.
>>
>> By a narrow legal definition. It was what anyone in the ordinary world
>> would call "rape".
>
> Then why wasn't he charged with it?
Statute of limitations.
>>
>> But thanks for admitting that they found that he committed it.
>
> I admitted nothing. No rape and no rape charges.
You disputed that it was "rape", but you didn't dispute that it was
sexual assault.