From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton, A Serial Sexual Predator And The Man Who Raped Me
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:38:37 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-08-26 18:16, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vaj7p5$2ls6u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-08-26 17:29, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vaj6co$2lmgd$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-08-26 16:52, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vaj24n$2ksk7$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-08-26 15:11, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vair0p$2k26m$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-08-26 13:25, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 10:00:45 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He was never sentenced or found guilty of rape.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He was found to have committed sexual assault.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Liable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He was held liable because a jury made a finding of fact that he had
>>>>>>>> committed sexual assault.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No rape.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Found to have committed a sexual assault which only wasn't "rape" under
>>>>>> a strict legal definition in New York State law.
>>>>>
>>>>> No rape. No rape charges. No insurrection, no insurrection charges.
>>>>
>>>> He was found to have committed a sexual assault which only wasn't rape
>>>> by a narrow legal definition.
>>>
>>> So no rape then.
>>
>> The judge clarified that it was rape as that word is commonly used.
>
> There was no rape and no charges of rape or he would be in jail.
Unless that criminal statute of limitations had expired and it was a
civil trial.
>>
>>>>
>>>> And there are most definitely insurrection charges that have been filed
>>>> against him.
>>>
>>> No there have not. No one has been charged with insurrection.
>>
>> Bzzzzt.
>>
>> Why can't you accept facts, Loser-3?
>
> No insurrection. Get dumber, you're down to 3.
Are you retracting your claim that he hasn't been charged for it?