From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton, A Serial Sexual Predator And The Man Who Raped Me In 1978, Will Be The Guest Speaker At The DNC Tonight. - Juanita Broaddrick
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 20:13:18 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vajahn$2m7mv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-08-26 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vaj7qf$2ls6u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-08-26 17:28, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vaj6b0$2lmgd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-08-26 16:53, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vaj25g$2ksk7$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-08-26 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vaitn3$2k9p2$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2024-08-26 14:47, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:11:08 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Not guilty. No rape charges.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So then you'll apply that same standard to Clinton, right?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Take him to trial and you'll see the difference.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The women he "allegedly" raped, will have a LOT more to say than the fruitcake E. Jean Carroll.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No rape.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No sexual assault.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Liable.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Found to have sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> But somehow, that isn't enough proof, when no testimony under oath at
> >>>>>>>> all is sufficient in the other case.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Still no rape. None.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Found to have committed rape after a trial by jury.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> After a trial? Only cheaters would do something like that. Why isn't he
> >>>>> in jail?
> >>>>
> >>>> Because it was a civil trial.
> >>>>
> >>>> But it was still a trial and the jury still found as a matter of FACT
> >>>> that he had committed sexual assault.
> >>>
> >>> But not rape.
> >>
> >> By a narrow legal definition. It was what anyone in the ordinary world
> >> would call "rape".
> >
> > Then why wasn't he charged with it?
>
> Statute of limitations.on
But rape was never in the charges.
>
> >>
> >> But thanks for admitting that they found that he committed it.
> >
> > I admitted nothing. No rape and no rape charges.
>
> You disputed that it was "rape", but you didn't dispute that it was
> sexual assault.
I wasn't talking about sexual assault. I was talking about the loony
libs that accuse him of rape.