From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton, A Serial Sexual Predator And The Man Who Raped Me
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 19:18:20 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-08-26 19:13, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vajahn$2m7mv$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-08-26 18:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vaj7qf$2ls6u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-08-26 17:28, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vaj6b0$2lmgd$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-08-26 16:53, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vaj25g$2ksk7$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-08-26 15:13, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vaitn3$2k9p2$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-08-26 14:47, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:11:08 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not guilty. No rape charges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So then you'll apply that same standard to Clinton, right?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Take him to trial and you'll see the difference.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The women he "allegedly" raped, will have a LOT more to say than the fruitcake E. Jean Carroll.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No rape.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No sexual assault.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Liable.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Found to have sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But somehow, that isn't enough proof, when no testimony under oath at
>>>>>>>>>> all is sufficient in the other case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Still no rape. None.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Found to have committed rape after a trial by jury.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After a trial? Only cheaters would do something like that. Why isn't he
>>>>>>> in jail?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because it was a civil trial.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But it was still a trial and the jury still found as a matter of FACT
>>>>>> that he had committed sexual assault.
>>>>>
>>>>> But not rape.
>>>>
>>>> By a narrow legal definition. It was what anyone in the ordinary world
>>>> would call "rape".
>>>
>>> Then why wasn't he charged with it?
>>
>> Statute of limitations.on
>
> But rape was never in the charges.
They weren't "charges"...
...but a jury found that he had committed a sexual assault that would be
called "rape" except under NYS's (narrow) legal definition.
>>
>>>>
>>>> But thanks for admitting that they found that he committed it.
>>>
>>> I admitted nothing. No rape and no rape charges.
>>
>> You disputed that it was "rape", but you didn't dispute that it was
>> sexual assault.
>
> I wasn't talking about sexual assault. I was talking about the loony
> libs that accuse him of rape.
So you agree that Trump sexually assault E. Jean Carroll.