Davin News Server

From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Tim Walz's "compassion" in action
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 12:15:21 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On 2024-08-27 16:27, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <val245$32gf4$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-08-27 04:16, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 07:45:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-08-26 04:16, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 11:45:38 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-08-25 07:28, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 18:08:36 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-08-24 11:00, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is facing criticism after a video surfaced
>>>>>>>>> showing him aggressively pulling his 17-year-old son Gus Walz?s arm on
>>>>>>>>> stage during the Democratic National Convention (DNC). The incident,
>>>>>>>>> which reportedly took place on the third day of the event (Wednesday),
>>>>>>>>> has sparked a debate over whether the governor?s actions were driven
>>>>>>>>> by anger or simply an overzealous moment of excitement.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The video was captured on Wednesday, the same night Gus was seen
>>>>>>>>> tearfully cheering for his father from the audience.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gus Walz, who reportedly has a nonverbal learning disorder and an
>>>>>>>>> anxiety disorder, appears visibly affected in the video, leading to
>>>>>>>>> concerns about the appropriateness of his father?s behavior. Some
>>>>>>>>> observers have theorized that Governor Walz was pulling his son?s arm
>>>>>>>>> out of frustration, while others suggest it was a spur-of-the-moment
>>>>>>>>> reaction without malicious intent.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The video has prompted a wave of reactions, with many questioning
>>>>>>>>> whether the governor?s actions crossed a line into abusive behavior.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The look on his wife?s face says it all. The eyes chico?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://defiantamerica.com/video-tim-walz-is-under-fire-for-aggressively-pulling-his-son-gus-walzs-arm-on-stage-at-the-dnc-the-look-on-his-wifes-face-says-it-all/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Video at the link.  The look of irritation of Tim Walz's face is
>>>>>>>>> unmistakable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He had to move quickly to prevent his son from walking into the
>>>>>>>> teleprompter...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You dodged what was said and ignored the look of rage that slipped
>>>>>>> out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    From your own source, idiot:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Update:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Full video of Tim Walz tugging his son?s arm appears to show that he was
>>>>>> quickly pulling him so he wouldn?t run into the teleprompter on stage.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is spin.
>>>>
>>>> If it is, it's "spin" your source agrees with.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry but yanking your kid would not be viewed as acceptable,
>>> especially with a look of rage on your face.
>>
>> There was no look of range.
> 
> No range. But rage yes.
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Walz came under fire after online users accused him of being too
>>>>>> aggressive with his special needs son.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A more detailed video of the situation suggests Walz was just acting
>>>>>> quickly to stop his son from hitting the teleprompter.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing that explains his look of rage, idiot.
>>>>
>>>> There was no such look.
>>>
>>> Deny all you want but it was most certainly there.
>>
>> Nope!
> 
> Oh yea. It was.

Nope!

>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The full video gives a better perspective of where the teleprompter was
>>>>>> compared to the Walz family.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Walz?s daughter, who was next to Gus Walz, walked in front of the
>>>>>> teleprompter while Gus, who appeared to be walking right towards the
>>>>>> teleprompter, was pulled behind it.'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And there is no "look of rage" in the video.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your willing blindness is noted.  Even Walz's wife give Waltz a dirty
>>>>> look about it.
>>>>
>>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> More denial of what is clearly visible.
>>
>> LOL!
> 
> 
> Laugh it off. You gonna vote for that prick.

You're... ...not bright, are you?