Davin News Server

On 2024-09-06 17:49, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vbfj3j$truf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-09-04 16:53, Skeeter wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> One can actually hear his words and later read the transcripts of his
>>>>>>>>>> gibberish.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You don't watch. You let MSM hand pick what they want you to hear.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even if that were true, they don't make up what he says, doofus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They edit what is said to make it appear something else was said.
>>>>>>> "fight" "bloodbath"   and many more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bullshit...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...and you know it.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is what happens. I watch him and then I see what the loser left
>>>>> says about it and it's all taken out of context.
>>>>
>>>> Give an example.
>>>
>>> Bloodbath.
>>
>> Since you ran away without providing an actual example of your claim,
>> I'll give you one for you to tell me how it was edited.
> 
> I did give an example. You are now running from it. Just like he never
> told anyone to inject bleach. You are so easily fooled.
>>
>> When asked what specific legislation Trump would support on child care
>> reform, and he offered up this response:
>>
>> '"I was sitting down and somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio and my
>> daughter Ivanka were so impactful on that issue, it's a very important
>> issue," said Trump. "But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers
>> that I'm talking about, that, because childcare is childcare, you know,
>> it's something you have to have it in this country, you have to have it.
>> But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers
>> that I'm talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they're
>> not used to, but they'll get used to it very quickly. And it's not going
>> to stop them from doing business with us, but they will have a very
>> substantial tax where they send product into our country. Those numbers
>> are so much bigger than any numbers that we're talking about, including
>> childcare, that it's going to take care, I look forward to having no
>> deficits within a fairly short period of time."'
>>
>> Now... ...that text I got from RawStory and used Chris Hayes' YouTube...
>>
>> ...but you can go here to check if they misquoted him:
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeVLALu2wTc>
>>
>> And you can get the rest of his answer until the next question was asked.
>>
>> This is from the automatically generated transcripts:
>>
>> 'coupled with
>> 1:39:00
>> uh the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of
>> the other things that are going on in our country
>> 1:39:07
>> because I have to stay with Jare I want to stay with Jare but those
>> numbers are small relative to the kind of economic
>> 1:39:13
>> numbers that I'm talking about including growth but growth also headed
>> up by what
>> 1:39:19
>> the plan is that I just uh that I just told you about we're going to be
>> taking in millions of dollars and as much as
>> 1:39:26
>> child care uh is talked about as being expensive it's relatively
>> speaking not
>> 1:39:31
>> very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we'll be taken and we're
>> going to make this into an incredible country
>> 1:39:37
>> that can afford to take care of its people and then we'll worry about
>> the rest of the world let's help other people but we're going to take
>> care of
>> 1:39:44
>> our country first this is about America first it's about make America great
>> 1:39:50
>> again we have to do it because right now we're a failing Nation will'll
>> take care of it thank you very good question thank'
>>
>> Now.
>>
>> You tell me how that isn't just gibberish.
> 
> You tell me why you ran away from the "bloodbath" statement.

Because it wasn't a complete statement, and I told you so.

You quoted one word and didn't explain how it was taken out of context 
or what its proper context was supposed to have been.

So I gave you the opportunity to explain how this was supposed to be 
taken...

...and you punked out.