Davin News Server

From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Tim Walz's "compassion" in action
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 08:51:24 -0600
Organization: UTB

In article <vbi5dt$1endb$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> 
> On 2024-09-06 17:49, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vbfj3j$truf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-09-04 16:53, Skeeter wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>> One can actually hear his words and later read the transcripts of his
> >>>>>>>>>> gibberish.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You don't watch. You let MSM hand pick what they want you to hear.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Even if that were true, they don't make up what he says, doofus.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> They edit what is said to make it appear something else was said.
> >>>>>>> "fight" "bloodbath"   and many more.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Bullshit...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...and you know it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That is what happens. I watch him and then I see what the loser left
> >>>>> says about it and it's all taken out of context.
> >>>>
> >>>> Give an example.
> >>>
> >>> Bloodbath.
> >>
> >> Since you ran away without providing an actual example of your claim,
> >> I'll give you one for you to tell me how it was edited.
> > 
> > I did give an example. You are now running from it. Just like he never
> > told anyone to inject bleach. You are so easily fooled.
> >>
> >> When asked what specific legislation Trump would support on child care
> >> reform, and he offered up this response:
> >>
> >> '"I was sitting down and somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio and my
> >> daughter Ivanka were so impactful on that issue, it's a very important
> >> issue," said Trump. "But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers
> >> that I'm talking about, that, because childcare is childcare, you know,
> >> it's something you have to have it in this country, you have to have it.
> >> But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers
> >> that I'm talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they're
> >> not used to, but they'll get used to it very quickly. And it's not going
> >> to stop them from doing business with us, but they will have a very
> >> substantial tax where they send product into our country. Those numbers
> >> are so much bigger than any numbers that we're talking about, including
> >> childcare, that it's going to take care, I look forward to having no
> >> deficits within a fairly short period of time."'
> >>
> >> Now... ...that text I got from RawStory and used Chris Hayes' YouTube...
> >>
> >> ...but you can go here to check if they misquoted him:
> >>
> >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeVLALu2wTc>
> >>
> >> And you can get the rest of his answer until the next question was asked.
> >>
> >> This is from the automatically generated transcripts:
> >>
> >> 'coupled with
> >> 1:39:00
> >> uh the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of
> >> the other things that are going on in our country
> >> 1:39:07
> >> because I have to stay with Jare I want to stay with Jare but those
> >> numbers are small relative to the kind of economic
> >> 1:39:13
> >> numbers that I'm talking about including growth but growth also headed
> >> up by what
> >> 1:39:19
> >> the plan is that I just uh that I just told you about we're going to be
> >> taking in millions of dollars and as much as
> >> 1:39:26
> >> child care uh is talked about as being expensive it's relatively
> >> speaking not
> >> 1:39:31
> >> very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we'll be taken and we're
> >> going to make this into an incredible country
> >> 1:39:37
> >> that can afford to take care of its people and then we'll worry about
> >> the rest of the world let's help other people but we're going to take
> >> care of
> >> 1:39:44
> >> our country first this is about America first it's about make America great
> >> 1:39:50
> >> again we have to do it because right now we're a failing Nation will'll
> >> take care of it thank you very good question thank'
> >>
> >> Now.
> >>
> >> You tell me how that isn't just gibberish.
> > 
> > You tell me why you ran away from the "bloodbath" statement.
> 
> Because it wasn't a complete statement, and I told you so.
> 
> You quoted one word and didn't explain how it was taken out of context 
> or what its proper context was supposed to have been.

You know exactly what I meant. You also know how it was intended. Play 
stupid.
> 
> So I gave you the opportunity to explain how this was supposed to be 
> taken...
> 
> ...and you punked out.