Davin News Server

On 2024-09-08 07:51, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vbi5dt$1endb$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-09-06 17:49, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vbfj3j$truf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-09-04 16:53, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> One can actually hear his words and later read the transcripts of his
>>>>>>>>>>>> gibberish.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You don't watch. You let MSM hand pick what they want you to hear.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Even if that were true, they don't make up what he says, doofus.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They edit what is said to make it appear something else was said.
>>>>>>>>> "fight" "bloodbath"   and many more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bullshit...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...and you know it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is what happens. I watch him and then I see what the loser left
>>>>>>> says about it and it's all taken out of context.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Give an example.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bloodbath.
>>>>
>>>> Since you ran away without providing an actual example of your claim,
>>>> I'll give you one for you to tell me how it was edited.
>>>
>>> I did give an example. You are now running from it. Just like he never
>>> told anyone to inject bleach. You are so easily fooled.
>>>>
>>>> When asked what specific legislation Trump would support on child care
>>>> reform, and he offered up this response:
>>>>
>>>> '"I was sitting down and somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio and my
>>>> daughter Ivanka were so impactful on that issue, it's a very important
>>>> issue," said Trump. "But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers
>>>> that I'm talking about, that, because childcare is childcare, you know,
>>>> it's something you have to have it in this country, you have to have it.
>>>> But when you talk about those numbers, compared to the kind of numbers
>>>> that I'm talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they're
>>>> not used to, but they'll get used to it very quickly. And it's not going
>>>> to stop them from doing business with us, but they will have a very
>>>> substantial tax where they send product into our country. Those numbers
>>>> are so much bigger than any numbers that we're talking about, including
>>>> childcare, that it's going to take care, I look forward to having no
>>>> deficits within a fairly short period of time."'
>>>>
>>>> Now... ...that text I got from RawStory and used Chris Hayes' YouTube...
>>>>
>>>> ...but you can go here to check if they misquoted him:
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeVLALu2wTc>
>>>>
>>>> And you can get the rest of his answer until the next question was asked.
>>>>
>>>> This is from the automatically generated transcripts:
>>>>
>>>> 'coupled with
>>>> 1:39:00
>>>> uh the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of
>>>> the other things that are going on in our country
>>>> 1:39:07
>>>> because I have to stay with Jare I want to stay with Jare but those
>>>> numbers are small relative to the kind of economic
>>>> 1:39:13
>>>> numbers that I'm talking about including growth but growth also headed
>>>> up by what
>>>> 1:39:19
>>>> the plan is that I just uh that I just told you about we're going to be
>>>> taking in millions of dollars and as much as
>>>> 1:39:26
>>>> child care uh is talked about as being expensive it's relatively
>>>> speaking not
>>>> 1:39:31
>>>> very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we'll be taken and we're
>>>> going to make this into an incredible country
>>>> 1:39:37
>>>> that can afford to take care of its people and then we'll worry about
>>>> the rest of the world let's help other people but we're going to take
>>>> care of
>>>> 1:39:44
>>>> our country first this is about America first it's about make America great
>>>> 1:39:50
>>>> again we have to do it because right now we're a failing Nation will'll
>>>> take care of it thank you very good question thank'
>>>>
>>>> Now.
>>>>
>>>> You tell me how that isn't just gibberish.
>>>
>>> You tell me why you ran away from the "bloodbath" statement.
>>
>> Because it wasn't a complete statement, and I told you so.
>>
>> You quoted one word and didn't explain how it was taken out of context
>> or what its proper context was supposed to have been.
> 
> You know exactly what I meant. You also know how it was intended. Play
> stupid.


No, I really don't.

But there is no doubt at all about the example I provided.

And that you are desperately trying to ignore it really says it all.