From: R Kym Horsell <kymhorsell@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,sci.environment,can.politics
Subject: Re: Monitoring "progress" to 2050 : CO2
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 21:38:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: kymhorsell.com
In alt.global-warming clownshow <sss@example.de> wrote:
> On 9/16/2024 2:44 PM, R Kym Horsell wrote:
>> In alt.global-warming clownshow <sss@example.de> wrote:
>>> On 9/16/2024 2:08 PM, R Kym Horsell wrote:
>>>> clownshow <sss@example.de> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/16/2024 9:46 AM, N_Cook wrote:
>>>>>> Jan 2022 output was 515.25
>>>>> CO2 PPM during our most fecund geologic epochs was over 3,000 PPM,
>>>>> clownshow.
>>>> Just no mammals, right?
>>> Dead wrong!
>> ...
>>> We estimate CO2 concentrations of more than 2,000 p.p.m. for the late
>> ...
>> 2000 is not 3000 clownshow.
> AGAIN:
...
Did they change that 2 into a 3 in the last 10 min?
Everyone knows mammals kicked off around 230 mn y ago in the late Triassic.
At CO2 then was not 10x "present" levels.
The table from Rothman shows they were high but not THAT high -- less
than 4x present levels.
I know a factor of 2 or 3 is nothing to an outsider scientist or mental
patient.
--
[Outsider science:]
"[Outsider art] could be by a mental patient, a hillbilly or a chimpanzee."
-- character Astrid Weller, "The Simpsons", 1999.