From: citizen winston smith <sss@example.de>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: "in summa consensu"
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:37:40 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 9/20/2024 4:33 PM, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-09-20 15:32, citizen winston smith wrote:
>> On 9/20/2024 4:15 PM, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 13:45:16 -0700, Alan says...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-09-20 13:38, citizen winston smith wrote:
>>>>> On 9/20/2024 2:26 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>> I know about the publishing process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Publish or perish - the reason we have so many delusional, grant-
>>>>> herded,
>>>>> per-slaved globull-worming acolytes.
>>>>
>>>> Look up what "non sequitur" means.
>>>
>>> LOL... agreed.
>>
>> Peer-chastening is a real and ongoing corruption of atmospheric science.
> Which is relevant to a discussion of BOOK publishing...
>
> ...how exactly?
Books are..wait for it...PUBLISHED!
Books may be...wait for it...on CLIMATE!
Peer review is critical to all academic textbooks, now isn't it troll?
You dumb fuck.