From: R Kym Horsell <kymhorsell@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: reproducing the 500mya climate (in a computer; we;ll do it for real, later)
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:01:00 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: kymhorsell.com
In alt.global-warming Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> wrote:
> On 9/20/2024 7:41 AM, Paul /D\ubrin wrote:
>> Le 20/09/2024 ?? 05:59, kymhorsell@gmail.com a ??crit??:
>>> Scientists have captured Earth's climate over the last 485 mn years.
>> No, they didn't. Computer specialists ran some sort of simulation.
> /D\ubrin "sort of" didn't read the study and doesn't know anything about it.
Luckily for the world the old fraud has been candid about not
knowing literally first thing about science.
--
KenCaldeira @KenCaldeira 21 May 2020 23:28Z
Replying to @EDC_Farmer
The essence of science is prediction. Science progresses by rejecting
models that make bad predictions.
<https://t.co/ASx86Ohgp1>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popp...
Making successful predictions is the gold standard of science. If a
theory successfully predicts phenomena that are later observed, one
can be confident that the theory captures something essential about
the real world system.
-- Andrew Dessler, testimony to US Senate, 21 Jan 2014
You have been stupid enough to write: "If a theory A predicts B and
we observe B then we have evidence the theory is true" and you are
telling me that pointing your error is some sophistry?
-- Paul /D\ubrin <chu8i...@free.fr>, 08 Jul 2012 18:36:01 GMT
There is a consensus that A => B and B is true does not imply
anything on A.
-- Paul /D\ubrin <chu8i...@free.fr>, 08 Jul 2012 12:46:34 GMT