From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Just turn on the large faucet!
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:57:38 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-09-25 11:20, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vd1inc$3p8g3$1@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987@teleworm.us says...
>>
>> Alan wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2024-09-25 07:40, De-Trois-Leaning wrote:
>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that you don't understand that you produce a false choice
>>>>> isn't my problem.
>>>>
>>>> The fact that you RUN from truth when confronted with it is well
>>>> established.
>>>>
>>>> Like claiming that Trump was wrong when he said there's no main valve to
>>>> redirect NoCal water:
>>>
>>> There is nothing like what Trump described.
>>
>> Even if there was a <laughing> faucet, (1) The people at the source in Canada
>> need that water; (2) The Columbia river doesn't go to California, let alone Los
>> Angeles; (3) Downstream is using too much water, inefficiently; (4) The impact
>> on the ecosystem would be bad.
>>
>> https://www.koin.com/news/oregon/expert-trumps-large-faucet-that-can-divert-water-from-pnw-to-la-doesnt-exist/
>>
>> ?Without knowing the details of a proper proposal, it is impossible to
>> assess its feasibility or the expense and damage such a system could cause
>> to the people and ecosystems of the Pacific Northwest,? O?Neill said. ?My
>> initial assessment is that diverting Columbia River water to Southern
>> California would be wildly impractical, inefficient, and expensive. Its
>> potentially damaging effects on the environment would be difficult to
>> assess without knowing the scope and location of the diversion.?
>>
>> It's just another massive brain fart from the orange dumbass.
>
> Taken out of context as usual. If he is such a dumbass why does Iran
> have a contract on him?
Talk about a non sequitur.