From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: You Do NOT Have The Right To Threaten Supreme Court Justice's Lives, No Matter WHAT The 1st Amendment Says, Idiot Lemmings
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 19:23:09 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:58:09 -0700, Alan says...
> > What choices? Trump said what about "choices"?
>
> YOU made that suggesting, doofus.
Uhhh... nope. Failure-1 did, failure-1.
> > Show us the part where he said it being only about threats. - Failure-1
>
> So... you're saying Trump wants people in jail for saying nice things about the Justices?
False dichotomy. - Failure-1
The choices aren't limited to threats or "nice things". - Failure-1
Again, for the galactically stupid - What choices? Trump or I said what about "choices"?
https://i.imgur.com/VwaTlhT.jpg
Go ahead... FIND it.
======================================================================================================================
Subject: You Do NOT Have The Right To Threaten Supreme Court Justice's Lives, No Matter WHAT The 1st Amendment Says,
Idiot Lemmings
From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats,
alt.politics.usa.republican
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.11 (GRC)
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 11:04:24 -0500
On 24 Sep 2024 13:09:33 -0000, Bradley K. Sherman says...
> | Trump says Americans who criticize the Supreme Court for
> | overturning Roe v. Wade should be imprisoned: "These people
> | should be put in jail for the way they talk about our
> | judges and justices"
Show us the part in the 1st Amendment that says you have the right to: express your thoughts about the SC justices
which include graphic threats of assassination and torture coupled with racist and homophobic rhetoric.
Show us.
They SHOULD be put in jail. Threatening to murder SC justice(s) is NOT freedom of speech, Faggley. Wanna know how many
people went to jail for threatening Black Jesus?
Threatening the president of the United States is a federal felony under United States Code Title 18, Section 871. It
consists of knowingly and willfully mailing or otherwise making "any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to
inflict great bodily harm upon the president of the United States". The law also includes presidential candidates, vice
presidents, and former presidents. The Secret Service investigates suspected violations of this law and monitors those
who have a history of threatening the president. Threatening the president is considered a political offense.
Immigrants who commit this crime can be deported.
The SC judges are not Presidents, and that is why Trump said they SHOULD be put in jail, because they aren't.
Why do you pansy-ass pussy liberals always lie about everything?
=====
Alaska Man Charged With Sending Graphic Threats To Kill Supreme Court Justices
Panos Anastasiou, 76, is accused of sending more than 465 messages through a public court website, including graphic
threats of assassination and torture coupled with racist and homophobic rhetoric.
Read this and say he deserves no punishment. THIS is what Trump is talking about, you fucking moron... and NOT taking
away ANYONE'S freedom of speech. If I threaten to kill you here on Usenet 465 times, are you going to inform anyone? OF
COURSE you are.
https://apnews.com/article/garland-supreme-court-justices-threats-charges-kavanaugh-thomas-
a4919daae078c7709a56e35e633526d8
=====
He's not the only one "talking" about SC justices this way. THEY need to be indicted to. A threat's a threat.
If conservatives were threatening the liberal justices, you'd be freaking out over that too, posting lies, but still
posting.
===============================================================================
Subject: Re: You Do NOT Have The Right To Threaten Supreme Court Justice's Lives, No Matter WHAT The 1st Amendment
Says, Idiot Lemmings
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats,
alt.politics.usa.republican
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:35:48 -0700
On 2024-09-24 09:04, AlleyCat wrote:
>
>
> On 24 Sep 2024 13:09:33 -0000, Bradley K. Sherman says...
>
>> | Trump says Americans who criticize the Supreme Court for
>> | overturning Roe v. Wade should be imprisoned: "These people
>> | should be put in jail for the way they talk about our
>> | judges and justices"
>
> Show us the part in the 1st Amendment that says you have the right to: express your thoughts about the SC justices
> which include graphic threats of assassination and torture coupled with racist and homophobic rhetoric.
Show us the part where he said it being only about threats.
=====
Subject: Re: You Do NOT Have The Right To Threaten Supreme Court Justice's Lives, No Matter WHAT The 1st Amendment
Says, Idiot Lemmings
From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats,
alt.politics.usa.republican
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.11 (GRC)
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:20:20 -0500
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:35:48 -0700, Alan says...
>
> On 2024-09-24 09:04, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 24 Sep 2024 13:09:33 -0000, Bradley K. Sherman says...
> >
> >> | Trump says Americans who criticize the Supreme Court for
> >> | overturning Roe v. Wade should be imprisoned: "These people
> >> | should be put in jail for the way they talk about our
> >> | judges and justices"
> >
> > Show us the part in the 1st Amendment that says you have the right to: express your thoughts about the SC justices
> > which include graphic threats of assassination and torture coupled with racist and homophobic rhetoric.
>
> Show us the part where he said it being only about threats.
So... you're saying Trump wants people in jail for saying nice things about the Justices?
Show us the part where it's about saying nice things... that aren't considered a threat.
You said you saw the clip... give us examples of people saying nice things about the Justices.
================================================================================================================
Subject: Re: You Do NOT Have The Right To Threaten Supreme Court Justice's Lives, No Matter WHAT The 1st Amendment
Says, Idiot Lemmings
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats,
alt.politics.usa.republican
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:24:44 -0700
On 2024-09-24 12:20, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:35:48 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>
>> On 2024-09-24 09:04, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24 Sep 2024 13:09:33 -0000, Bradley K. Sherman says...
>>>
>>>> | Trump says Americans who criticize the Supreme Court for
>>>> | overturning Roe v. Wade should be imprisoned: "These people
>>>> | should be put in jail for the way they talk about our
>>>> | judges and justices"
>>>
>>> Show us the part in the 1st Amendment that says you have the right to: express your thoughts about the SC justices
>>> which include graphic threats of assassination and torture coupled with racist and homophobic rhetoric.
>>
>> Show us the part where he said it being only about threats.
>
> So... you're saying Trump wants people in jail for saying nice things about the Justices?
False dichotomy.
The choices aren't limited to threats or "nice things".
>
> Show us the part where it's about saying nice things... that aren't considered a threat.
>
> You said you saw the clip... give us examples of people saying nice things about the Justices.
Irrelevant.
=====
Subject: Re: You Do NOT Have The Right To Threaten Supreme Court Justice's Lives, No Matter WHAT The 1st Amendment
Says, Idiot Lemmings
From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats,
alt.politics.usa.republican
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:43:46 -0500
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:24:44 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>
> >>> Show us the part in the 1st Amendment that says you have the right to: express your thoughts about the SC justices
> >>> which include graphic threats of assassination and torture coupled with racist and homophobic rhetoric.
> >>
> >> Show us the part where he said it being only about threats.
> >
> > So... you're saying Trump wants people in jail for saying nice things about the Justices?
> The choices aren't limited to threats or "nice things".
What choices? Trump said what about "choices"?
And if he never said anything about "choices", they can't be or can't NOT be limited.
https://i.imgur.com/HveifvE.jpg
When will you EVER fucking realize it? You're no good at this, making shit up as you go to try and "win" to somehow
help boost whatever is causing your low self-esteem?
=====
Subject: Re: You Do NOT Have The Right To Threaten Supreme Court Justice's Lives, No Matter WHAT The 1st Amendment
Says, Idiot Lemmings
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats,
alt.politics.usa.republican
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:58:09 -0700
On 2024-09-24 14:43, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:24:44 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>>>>
>>>>> Show us the part in the 1st Amendment that says you have the right to: express your thoughts about the SC
justices
>>>>> which include graphic threats of assassination and torture coupled with racist and homophobic rhetoric.
>>>>
>>>> Show us the part where he said it being only about threats.
>>>
>>> So... you're saying Trump wants people in jail for saying nice things about the Justices?
>
>> The choices aren't limited to threats or "nice things".
>
> What choices? Trump said what about "choices"?
YOU made that suggesting, doofus.
NOPE.