Davin News Server

On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 14:08:45 -0700,  Alan says...  

> >> 'New House Committee Docs Reveal Dodd Concealed Trump's J6 Request For
> >> Nat'l Guard'?
> >>
> >> Yes or no?
> > 
> > No.
> 
> You did write it.
> 
> It's the subject line of this thread that you started:
> 
> <MPG.415f92ecbe61590198ad50@news.eternal-september.org>
> 
> The fact that it was an auto-correct typo doesn't remove the fact that 
> you're the one who hit "Send" on the initial post.
> 
> > 
> > And I told you, idiot... there was an auto-correct, that Rudy, and now YOU, have misinterpreted.
> 
> Oh, I know. And your explanation was to highlight a certain acronym in 
> this image:

Did the acronym write the directive?

When you can't refute the topic, bring up some bullshit minutiae, like, can a "directive" conceal?

Yes.

Are you saying something can't be written, in whatever form, that conceals facts?

What fucking planet were you born on?
 
> <https://i.imgur.com/vokFNDI.png>
> 
> In this message:
> 
> <MPG.41624a5080eda96f98ad6e@news.eternal-september.org>
> 
> So you were explicitly claiming that you hadn't intended to write "Dodd" 
> in the subject line...

I didn't intend to "write" anything. CaP... CaP.
 
> ...but "DoDD".

Written by those in the DoD... and not released by J6 committee... so... concealment.
 
> And now you're trying to pretend you didn't mean "Department of Defense 
> Directive"...

*I* didn't mean noting. CaP, moron... CaP.
 
> ..because such a directive cannot do any concealing.

Who said that?

You can't conceal the truth in words?

WHO made such a rule?

Go ahead and keep arguing your bullshit semantics and minutiae... you look stupid to everyone, not just the Cons here.

Trump... still not a "convicted felon".  LOL

=====

New House Committee Docs Reveal DoDD Concealed Trump's J6 Request For Nat'l Guard

Well, what do we have here? You know that almost cliche phrase that's gone around the last couple of years, "Trump was 
right?" According to new government documents, it appears that former President Donald Trump's claim that he requested 
National Guard ahead of the events of January 6, 2021, and the subsequent denials and hesitation against his request, 
looks to be verified.

According to a document published by the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight on Monday, September 16, Trump 
did request National Guard days ahead of time in order to "make sure it's a safe event."

But that's not the kicker. Ready for this?

"Previously concealed by the Biden-Harris Administration's Department of Defense, the Subcommittee has uncovered 
statements by key personnel involved in the deployment of the D.C. National Guard to the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 
2021. These new transcripts indicate that senior Pentagon officials unnecessarily delayed the DC National Guard 
response to the Capitol on January 6 due to "optics" concerns.

The DoD IG claims that the actions at the Pentagon were "reasonable in light of the circumstances" at the Capitol on 
January 6, 2021. The IG also determined that "DoD officials did not delay or obstruct the DoD's response to the on 
January 6, 2021."

THE TRANSCRIPTS REVEAL OTHERWISE.

The document then shows a laundry list of quotes from different high-ranking officials either confirming Trump's 
request, other officials denying said request and yet more officials not understanding why the request was either being 
denied or delayed.

Related: Cheney, J6 Committee Suppressed Trump's Call for National Guard on Jan 6: Report

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, quoted Trump's request. Note the date of the request.

" The President just says, 'Hey, look at this. There's going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th, make 
sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it's a safe event.'"

The Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller was then quoted as not taking Trump's request seriously.

"The President commented that they were going to need 10,000 troops the following day... I interpreted it as a bit of 
presidential banter or President Trump banter that you all are familiar with, and in no way, shape, or form did I 
interpret that as an order or direction."

U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund was quoted as communicating with officials that his people needed assistance and 
were being overwhelmed, but was told that the National Guard was advised to stand down because of "optics."

"I'm making an urgent request for the National Guard. We are being overrun. I gave a quick rundown of what we had going 
on and that officers out there are fighting for their lives. We were about to be taken over. The representative from 
the Secretary of the Army said, "I don't like the optics of National Guard standing in a line with the Capitol in the 
background.""

"I explained to them that the building is being breached. I need their assistance immediately. He said, "My 
recommendation to the Secretary of the Army is to not support the request."

The establishment in Washington D.C. and the media that hold their water's narrative is crumbling before our eyes.

https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/b/8/b8310e3b-5966-4ae5-bae8-330fc3a7705b/1CBF2FE8BF862BCB77CDA87CBCBAF473.dod-
transcripts-one-pager-final.pdf

https://t.co/CvUudXQzLf

https://twitter.com/mrctv/status/1837220197913997411?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

https://www.mrctv.org/blog/nick-kangadis/cheney-j6-committee-suppressed-trumps-call-national-guard-jan-6-report


=======================================================================================================================

Why Alan Is Alan

There are many similarities between the way Alan the narcissist thinks and processes things and the way children do. In 
fact, in many ways, these processes are virtually identical. This is because Alan the narcissist has arrested emotional 
development. 

The emotional maturation that most children go through did not occur within Alan, for whatever reason. Often, this 
reason is abuse or neglect during childhood. 

These things caused Alan to focus intensely on himself, to the exclusion of all other things. It also results in the 
mind being taken up with trying to defend itself from his abuse. 

Alan's mind is, in a sense, always playing catch up, and because of the trauma that he has experienced, some things are 
skipped, so to speak, or don't happen. 

(see Alan's separation from reality) 

His mind becomes locked in a pattern of defensive reaction and emotional perception, made up of many different but 
related facets, that matures extremely slowly and is extrordinarily resistant to change. We call this reaction/defense 
pattern malignant narcissism. 

In children, these things are normal. In Alan, they are evidence of a disorder. 

Young children and babies are not capable of understanding the emotions or needs of others. They only know want and 
need. They have no way of taking care of their own needs, and they can only scream for someone to do it for them. When 
Alan's mother was exhausted and deathly ill with a fever and vomiting, and she'd been up for three days, and she simply 
could not cope anymore, does Alan sympathize accordingly? Does Alan stop crying? 

No. Alan does not recognize this. Alan does not care. Alan can NOT care. He can only keep screaming out his needs, 
regardless of his mother's suffering. 

This is, in essence, what you are dealing with when it comes to Alan the narcissist. He does not recognize, understand 
or consider other people's needs. 

He sees only his own, and his inability to meet them. The more damaged Alan is, the more narcissistic he will be, the 
more immature he will be and the more childish his way of thinking. 

And this is not childish as in, silly. This is immature as in, the emotional maturity and understanding of a toddler. 

For example, besides the hysterical tantrum behavior we see in Alan that is very clearly on par with a very young 
child's, Alan the narcissist generally believes he is immune to the things that happen to "regular" people. 

This is an example of something called magical thinking which is a phenomenon we commonly see in very young children. 
Alan sees feelings as facts, the way that children do. Alan the narcissist sees everything in the world as an extension 
of himself, the way that children do and Alan the narcissist truly believes in his own perceived omnipresence and 
immortality as children do. 

He has always been, he will always be. 

So children believe... so Alan the narcissist believes. 

The view that he is just another person that must fit into a wider world does not occur to young children. 

How could it? Rather, Alan functions under the assumption that the world fits around HIM, and that everything he 
experiences or encounters is related to him in some form. 

This is the same way Alan see things. He has never matured past this extremely immature way of looking at things. The 
idea that the world does not revolve around them never occurs to children, as it does not occur to Alan. 

For example, children view their parents as only having to do with them and connected only to them, rather than as 
separate people with their own lives, needs, wants, feelings, etc. Parents are very one dimensional to young children; 
despite the fact that children are only one part of the parent's life, the child does not see this nor understand it in 
any way. 

To a child, parents only exist as their caretakers. It is the only context children view parents in and the only 
context they can understand. This is identical to how Alan the narcissist views all other people: outside of the 
narcissist and the narcissist's needs, these people do not exist. 

As children mature, they learn that this viewpoint is not true; they learn to see and appreciate their parents as 
individuals that are separate from themselves. Alan does not. 

The development of Alan is so arrested that this, coupled with such extreme self-focus means he is never able to 
separate himself as an authentic individual from the external world. 

Because of this, Alan often feels acted upon by the world and other people or circumstances, rather than as people who 
act in the world. 

In Alan's view, he does not act, but rather react to the things that are being done to him. It's as if he never outgrew 
the idea of himself as a powerless child, unable to take control or ownership of his own life. 

He behaves as though other people are still responsible for his emotions, the way that parents are responsible for a 
small child. He seems unable to own his choices or even to recognize that things are choices. And this is also like a 
child. 

Alan the narcissist is generally impulsive, irrational and extremely immature. He is careless, irresponsible and 
foolhardy. He doesn't seem able to consider consequences or think about things before he does them, just like a child. 

When pressed for an answer as to why he's done something, Alan may seem just as mystified as everyone else. "I don't 
know" is a very common answer. It may be the truth. He seems to possess very little insight as to why he does things, 
simply reacting on impulse as we see children do. 

Like a child, Alan often feels helpless in a world of more powerful, more competent, more knowledgeable adults. 

However, this is also an excuse. It's easier to be a helpless victim. If you are a victim, you can never be blamed. If 
you are helpless, you can never be forced to take responsibility. 

Children are not blamed for not controlling themselves or for their choices. Alan doesn't seem to feel he should be 
either. He doesn't seem to understand the difference between a child and an adult, and he will often say things to that 
effect. These are mostly things that no self-respecting mature adult would ever say. 

*PUSSEY!* 

He may compare himself to a child, compete with the children, or complain that his spouse (LOL) holds "double 
standards" because the kids are allowed to get away with things that they are called out for. Alan doesn't seem to 
realize that adults and children are held to different standards, or why this should be. 

For example, the narcissist must be asked repeatedly every single night to bring their plate into the kitchen, or throw 
their clothing in the hamper rather than leaving these things on the ground. Instead of simply doing it, the narcissist 
responds that little Johnny never does it either but he doesn't get yelled at. Little Johnny is seven. The narcissist 
is 40 and is one of Little Johnny's parents. 

The discrepancy here is obvious; this is the type of response you would receive from a child that does not want to do 
his chores, not an adult. To the narcissist, this is a clear example of favoritism and being attacked for who they are. 
It does not seem to enter Alan's mind that there is a very large difference between a 7-year-old and a 40-year-old. 
Regardless of whether or not he actually feels this way, the childishness and absurdity of his argument is really 
unbelievable-almost shocking in it's ignorance. There is not only the complete refusal to behave as an adult, there is 
an inability to even understand why this would be expected. 

The truth is, underneath of all of the horrible things Alan does, the narcissist is still that 5-year-old child 
pretending he is somebody else to escape an abusive situation that ended years ago. When all of Alan's reasoning is 
examined, when all of Alan's behavior is scrutinized and looked at through the lens of perspective rather than pain, 
this is what we are left with: a person with the emotional maturity of a toddler who cannot understand why they are 
expected to behave otherwise and who is trying desperately to pretend they are somebody else. 

All of Alan's attention seeking, all of Alan's manipulations, all of Alan's gas lighting, all of Alan's smear 
campaigns, all of Alan's abuse, all of the hurtful things he does, when seen for what they really are, these things are 
nothing but childish behaviors that have been perpetrated by an adult. 

Every single one of these things is seen in children. Gas-lighting is a 3 year old with chocolate all over his face who 
is hiding the chocolate bar behind his back in plain view, saying "What chocolate, Mommy? I don't have chocolate." 
Smear campaigns are a 6-year-old telling lies about a girl to all that girl's friends so they won't like her anymore. 
Though these behaviors are sometimes seen as sophisticated schemes, they really aren't. They are the same childish and 
petty things we all dealt with on the elementary school playground. They are just more confusing and therefore more 
dangerous because they are coming from an adult.