From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Damn... This Dude's Stupid - Thinks A Directive Can "Undertake
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 11:12:53 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-09-30 18:36, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:47:30 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>> You're saying a document cannot conceal facts and or figures?
>
>> I'm saying that your claim was initially that a DIRECTIVE undertook
>> actions to conceal something makes no sense.
>
> Nope... I never said that... that is YOUR claim.
'New House Committee Docs Reveal Dodd Concealed Trump's J6 Request For
Nat'l Guard'
Don't claim that "Docs" is the subject of the verb "Concealed" because...
...because "Docs" is the subject of the verb "Reveal" in that sentence
and "Dodd" is clearly the subject of the verb "Concealed" in there.
>
>> What directive would that be, Pussey? Issued WHEN?
That's the POINT, Pussey.
It would have to be a directive written AFTER the events of Jan 6 for it
even to be possible for it to have "omitted" (not "concealed") any facts
pertinent to that matter.