From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Damn... This Dude's Stupid - Thinks A Directive Can "Undertake
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 13:19:36 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-01 19:59, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 11:12:53 -0700, Alan says...
>
>> Subject: Re: Damn... This Dude's Stupid - Thinks A Directive Can "Undertake Actions"! Wow!
>> From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>> Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics
>>
>> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
>> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 11:12:53 -0700
>>
>> On 2024-09-30 18:36, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:47:30 -0700, Alan says...
>>>
>>>>> You're saying a document cannot conceal facts and or figures?
>>>
>>>> I'm saying that your claim was initially that a DIRECTIVE undertook
>>>> actions to conceal something makes no sense.
>>>
>>> Nope... I never said that... that is YOUR claim.
>>
>> 'New House Committee Docs Reveal Dodd Concealed Trump's J6 Request For
>> Nat'l Guard'
>
> Are you telling us, that it's impossible for the DoD to conceal facts, statements, etc., IN a directive...
Nope.
>
> ... after the fact?
>
But you'll need to show a directive that was written "after the fact".
> Do I really have to spell it out for you?
>
> Do you know what "brevity" means?
>
> Many outlets shorten titles by leaving out words, like "the" and others.
>
> Here goes... pay attention.
>
> "New House Committee Documents Reveal that a DOD Directive Concealed Trump's January 6th Request For The National Guard
> To Go To The Capitol And Control the Protesters"
Which directive would that be?