From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: LOL... When Lying Liberal Faggots Lose An Argument, They Turn To Arguing About Hypotheticals
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:10:59 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <ve22l4$1tq8k$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-07 18:03, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 13:29:14 -0700, Alan says...
> >
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-06 06:41, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 22:59:10 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-05 19:31, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 18:36:12 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The hypothetical was YOURS...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes...
> >>>>
> >>>> So you were the one who "Turn[ed] to Arguing About Hypotheticals"
> >>>
> >>> I hope you take your medicine soon.
> >
> >> You're the one who introduced a hypothetical, Pussey.
> >
> > Did I argue ABOUT "the" hypothetical or hypotheticals in general"?
>
> I pointed out that your hypothetical WAS a hypothetical and a useless one.
and you cowardly snipped the part that slapped you silly and you can't
refute.