Davin News Server

On 2024-10-11 15:42, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vec63v$3qdue$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-11 10:34, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vebjhv$3nnuq$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-11 05:19, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <ve9ta5$3btbs$8@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-09 15:28, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <ve6oiv$2pdmp$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-09 05:01, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-09, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:40:38 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-08 10:34, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Vice President Kamala Harris was pressed by CBS News' Bill Whitaker
>>>>>>>>>>>> about whether it was a "mistake" for the Biden administration to go
>>>>>>>>>>>> soft on its border policies during a tense exchange on Monday's
>>>>>>>>>>>> special election episode of "60 Minutes."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "You recently visited the southern border and embraced President
>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden's recent crackdown on asylum seekers, and that crackdown
>>>>>>>>>>>> produced an almost immediate and dramatic decrease in the number of
>>>>>>>>>>>> border crossings," Whitaker said. "If that's the right answer now, why
>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't your administration take those steps in 2021?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "The first bill we proposed to Congress was to fix our broken
>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration system, knowing that if you want to actually fix it, we
>>>>>>>>>>>> need Congress to act. It was not taken up," Harris responded. "Fast
>>>>>>>>>>>> forward to a moment when a bipartisan group of members of the United
>>>>>>>>>>>> States Senate, including one of the most conservative members of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> United States Senate, got together, came up with a border security
>>>>>>>>>>>> bill.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Well, guess what happened? Donald Trump got word that this bill was
>>>>>>>>>>>> afoot and could be passed, and he wants to run on a problem instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing a problem. So he told his buddies in Congress, 'Kill the bill,
>>>>>>>>>>>> don't let it move forward.'"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "I've been covering the border for years, and so I know this is not a
>>>>>>>>>>>> problem that started with your administration," Whitaker said. "But
>>>>>>>>>>>> there was an historic flood of undocumented immigrants coming across
>>>>>>>>>>>> the border the first three years of your administration. As a matter
>>>>>>>>>>>> of fact, arrivals quadrupled from the last year of President Trump."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Was it a mistake to loosen the immigration policies as much as you
>>>>>>>>>>>> did?" Whitaker then asked.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "It's a long-standing problem, and solutions are at hand, and from day
>>>>>>>>>>>> one, literally, we have been offering solutions," Harris responded.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/media/60-minutes-asks-harris-whether-mistake-biden-admin-go-soft-border-vp-repeatedly-dodges?fbclid=IwY2xjawFyTABleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHU7b1A3i67zYH1ZuuRcDgOkGCtU25HYve9RL5lNUqEw1DXjdyJOP88WFjg_aem_oRywo9a6LtumpPT67x6Nsw
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No she has not offered solutions.  That bill did nothing to strengthen
>>>>>>>>>>>> the border and repeating the lie doesn't make it true.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If the bill did nothing to strengthen the border...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ...why did Trump want it killed?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because it spent a bunch of money that did nothing to address the
>>>>>>>>>> problem?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Duh.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That bill would have codified illegal immigration.
>>>>>>>>> It was a disaster and Republicans who were in favor of it obviously did not
>>>>>>>>> read the bill because it was awful.
>>>>>>>> Quote an "awful" provision of that bill.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Money to Ukraine. That's not our border.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Money for Ukraine was not in the last version of the border bill.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes it was.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the text of the bill:
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4361/text>
>>>>
>>>> Show it.
>>>
>>> I can't be arsed to point out the obvious.
>>
>> I'll state it clearly.
>>
>> There is no text in the bill that provides anything to Ukraine.
> 
> I keep you busy don't I? Since you have no job to go to.

You amuse me... ...a little.

Now, quote the text you claim gives money for Ukraine in that bill.

Or are you too chicken?