From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Who's fact checking the fact checkers
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:32:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-13 16:28, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <veh1v4$o4fh$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-13 06:43, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <veeilq$90fg$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-12 11:35, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> So Kamela, in her town hall appears to have use of a teleprompter. The
>>>>> media is trying to "fact-check" this and deny a teleprompter was in
>>>>> use. Prime example is this:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.yahoo.com/news/posts-falsely-claim-kamala-harris-193335700.html
>>>>>
>>>>> The pictures included do not include the picture of words being
>>>>> clearly visible in the pan by shot that suddenly get shut off.
>>>>>
>>>>> If they were Spanish and for the interviewer, why were they facing HER
>>>>> and why were they removed suddenly in the pan shot?
>>>>
>>>> A couple of quick questions:
>>>>
>>>> If she's reading from a teleprompter...
>>>>
>>>> ...how is it she goes on speaking even after it's turned off?
>>>
>>> You mean repeating herself?
>>
>> No. Because she wasn't repeating herself.
>
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA...You gotta be trollen. I watched her lose it.
Quote it and give a time index.
>>
>>>>
>>>> And when a teleprompter is in use, the text is continuously scrolling as
>>>> the person speaks...
>>>>
>>>> ...so why wasn't it doing that?
>>>
>>> and that's why she froze up.
>>
>> She didn't. She kept on speaking without even a small stutter.
>
> Repeating herself.
Quote it and give a time index.
>>
>>>>
>>>> The whole townhall is available on YouTube in 1080p, and while you
>>>> cannot make out the words that are on the screen, it doesn't seem to me
>>>> that they match the words that she was speaking.
>>>
>>> 32 days <cackle> only 32 days <cackle> just 32 days
>>
>> What time index is that from?
>
> Look it up.
So you can't give one.
Got it.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, her eyeline. Humans are very good at reading where other humans
>>>> are looking. She is clearly being shot from the camera that has the
>>>> teleprompter attached to it, that's true, but her eyes are clearly
>>>> looking above and to the left of the camera...
>>>
>>> You are a moron. We all saw her fuck up.
>>
>> You're lying or you didn't even look.
>
> I watched it . Damn you're dense.
Quote it and give a time index.
>>
>>>>
>>>> ...which is exactly where the person who asked the question is standing.
>>>>
>>>> And there are other parts of the video where Harris is speaking, but you
>>>> absolutely CAN see what's on the teleprompter as she's speaking:
>>>
>>> But what about when it wasn't running?
>>
>> Show me a single time in that video other than the brief moment where
>> the moderator steps aside (and the text turns off)
>>
>> Where there is any text on the teleprompter.
>
> She fucked up. That is the simple truth.
Quote it and give a time index.
>>
>>>>
>>>> A TIMER.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/live/XdvHSwQswoI?t=985s
>>>>
>>>> Look how long she speaks to that question (2:21 from the time index),
>>>> and you can see every time the shot includes the teleprompter, it's not
>>>> showing any text.
>>>>
>>>> Now be an adult and admit you were wrong.
>>> 32 days!!!<cackle>
>> You can't admit when you're wrong.
>
> I'm not. That's whats so funny.
That's right, you're not admitting you're wrong.