From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: This How You Can Tell Liberals And Narcissists Are Really Just Lonely Little Boys Who Beg For Attention
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:35:51 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vejjrg$19kmg$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-13 19:40, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > They throw out the topic in which they're not smart enough to refute and start pissing and moaning about something that
> > has NOTHING to do with the topic... at all.
> >
> > In this case, Ski Bunny can't refute the topic, so he whines about not being able to find a study, which *I* did, in
> > the OP. I gave him "links" and TOLD him it might not be in HTML format OR a URL, and he STILL kept whining about it.
> >
> > Dumb ass Ski Bunny thinks "links" can ONLY be html or URL in nature. Nope.
> So what is the nature of the link that you're NOW claiming.
>
> This started with you claiming there was a link to the McKinsey and
> Company study, and when I said that the article didn't show us that
> study, you said, "It's linked".
>
> Well it was NOT linked.
>
> You said nothing about the link being in any other format than a normal URL.
>
> In fact, this post is the first time you've tried to spin it to make
> this new claim.
>
> So:
>
> 1. Prove you have actually seen this study by ANY method, by SHOWING IT.
>
> 2. Show the steps it took to get there.
Still no job to go to?