From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: "I Was Trump?s Ghostwriter. A New Biopic Gets the Most Important Thing Right."
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:54:33 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-14 10:53, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vejlme$19kmg$18@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-14 10:40, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vejkoh$19kmg$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-12 19:01, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:16:35 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> BUTWHATABOUT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Except Biden didn't steal documents, Chicken.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, he did.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of the documents he had were NOT for EX-VPs to have.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Special counsel Robert Hur released a searing report Thursday that concluded President Joe Biden willfully retained
>>>>> and disclosed classified military and national security information."
>>>>>
>>>>> "The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
>>>>> vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
>>>>
>>>> False.
>>>>
>>>> You should read the entire report.
>>>
>>> Why would they want to have a trial then? Joe was found to frail to
>>> stand trial. WTF is that?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A traitorous act.
>>>>>
>>>>> CNN: Facts First: Biden's claim that none of the classified material found in his possession was highly classified is
>>>>> false, according to details provided by the special counsel. Hur reported the discovery of documents in Biden's
>>>>> possession that had markings identifying them as "Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information," a very high level of
>>>>> classification - plus handwritten notebooks from Biden's time as vice president that weren't marked as classified but
>>>>> that "contain information that remains classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level."
>>>> But do you stick to your story that it wasn't theft when Trump:
>>>>
>>>> Deliberately took documents.
>>>>
>>>> And denied he had them?
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>
>> Oh, you poor little Chicken:
>>
>> 'It is not our role to assess the criminal charges pending against Mr.
>> Trump, but several material distinctions between Mr. Trump's case and
>> Mr. Biden's are clear. Unlike the evidence involving Mr. Biden, the
>> allegations set forth in the indictment of Mr. Trump, if proven, would
>> present serious aggravating facts.
>>
>> Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified
>> documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite.
>> According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents
>> for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to
>> destroy evidence and then to lie about it. In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned
>> in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department of
>> Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his
>> homes, sat for a voluntary interview. and in other ways cooperated with
>> the investigation.'
>
> So? Biden was just as guilty.
Nope:
'In contrast, Mr. Eiden turned in classified documents to the National
Archives and the Department of Justice, consented to the search of
multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview.
and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.'
All those are the exact opposite of "just as guilty".