Davin News Server

In article <MPG.4177bb72b01195a998aee4@news.eternal-september.org>, 
katt@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:05:15 -0700,  Alan says...  
> 
> > 
> > On 2024-10-14 20:59, AlleyCat wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:19:43 -0700,  Alan says...
> > > 
> > >> Subject: Re: This How You Can Tell Liberals And Narcissists Are Really Just Lonely Little Boys Who Beg For Attention
> > >> From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
> > >> Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics
> > >>
> > >> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
> > >> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> > >> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:19:43 -0700
> > >>
> > >> On 2024-10-13 19:40, AlleyCat wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> They throw out the topic in which they're not smart enough to refute and start pissing and moaning about something that
> > >>> has NOTHING to do with the topic... at all.
> > >>>
> > >>> In this case, Ski Bunny can't refute the topic, so he whines about not being able to find a study, which *I* did, in
> > >>> the OP. I gave him "links" and TOLD him it might not be in HTML format OR a URL, and he STILL kept whining about it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Dumb ass Ski Bunny thinks "links" can ONLY be html or URL in nature.    Nope.
> > > 
> > >> So what is the nature of the link that you're NOW claiming.
> > > 
> > > I already told you in a post.
> > 
> > No, you didn't.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Look it up.
> > > 
> > > URL, html...
> > > 
> > > Date: 10/09/24 07:00 PM:
> > > In reply to Skeeter:
> > > 
> > > It was TOO easy for me to find out, not only the study's name, but what was in it, just by following a few links and
> > > WORDS that, when put into a search engine, BECAME links.
> > 
> > The fact that you have to say "became" means that this:
> > 
> > "It's linked,"
> > 
> > ...was bullshit.
> 
> Aw... poor wittle baby.
> 
> Can't refute, HAS to focus on some off-topic bullshit "you said this" or "you said that" instead of focusing on the 
> topic.
> 
> One of these days I'll let you win one...
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> ... but not today.  LOL
> 
> Refute or die!
> 
> =====
> 
> Huge Percentage Of EV Owners Want To Go Back To Normal Cars, Study Finds
> 
> https://dailycaller.com/2024/06/20/electric-vehicle-owners-40-percent-gas-cars-mckinsey
> 
> Nearly half of American electric vehicle (EV) owners want to buy an internal combustion engine model the next time they 
> buy a car, according to a new study from McKinsey and Company, a leading consulting firm.
> 
> Approximately 46% of Americans who own an EV want to go back to a standard vehicle for their next purchase, citing 
> issues like inadequate charging infrastructure and affordability, according to McKinsey's study, which was obtained and 
> reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation. The study's findings further suggest that the Biden administration's EV 
> push is struggling to land with American consumers, after 46% of respondents indicated that they are unlikely or very 
> unlikely to purchase an EV in a June poll conducted by The Associated Press and the University of Chicago's Energy 
> Policy Institute.
> 
> Moreover, 58% of Americans are very likely to keep their current cars for longer, and 44% are likely to postpone a 
> possible switch to EVs, McKinsey's study found. Consumers' concerns about EV charging infrastructure are notable given 
> the slow rollout of the Biden administration's $7.5 billion public EV charger program, which has so far led to the 
> construction of only a handful of chargers in nearly three years. (RELATED: Biden Admin Classifies Martha's Vineyard, 
> Elite Locales As 'Low-Income' To Push EV Charger Subsidies)
> 
> The Biden administration has a stated goal of having EVs make up 50% of all new car sales by 2030, and the 
> Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized stringent regulations in March that will force manufacturers to ensure 
> that up to 56% of their light-duty vehicles are EVs by 2032. The EPA has also finalized strict emissions standards for 
> medium- and light-duty vehicles, while the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has also locked in 
> fuel economy standards that will further push manufacturers to produce more EVs.
> 
> The administration is also spending billions of dollars to subsidize the production and purchase of EVs, but 
> manufacturers are still losing considerable amounts of cash on their EV product lines. EVs remained below a 10% share 
> of all auto sales in the U.S. in 2023, according to Cox Automotive.
> 
> The White House did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

He is trying to be like his hero Rudy.