From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: This How You Can Tell Liberals And Narcissists Are Really Just
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:52:43 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-14 22:36, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:05:15 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>
>> On 2024-10-14 20:59, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:19:43 -0700, Alan says...
>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: This How You Can Tell Liberals And Narcissists Are Really Just Lonely Little Boys Who Beg For Attention
>>>> From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>>>> Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics
>>>>
>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
>>>> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:19:43 -0700
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-13 19:40, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> They throw out the topic in which they're not smart enough to refute and start pissing and moaning about something that
>>>>> has NOTHING to do with the topic... at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case, Ski Bunny can't refute the topic, so he whines about not being able to find a study, which *I* did, in
>>>>> the OP. I gave him "links" and TOLD him it might not be in HTML format OR a URL, and he STILL kept whining about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dumb ass Ski Bunny thinks "links" can ONLY be html or URL in nature. Nope.
>>>
>>>> So what is the nature of the link that you're NOW claiming.
>>>
>>> I already told you in a post.
>>
>> No, you didn't.
>>
>>>
>>> Look it up.
>>>
>>> URL, html...
>>>
>>> Date: 10/09/24 07:00 PM:
>>> In reply to Skeeter:
>>>
>>> It was TOO easy for me to find out, not only the study's name, but what was in it, just by following a few links and
>>> WORDS that, when put into a search engine, BECAME links.
>>
>> The fact that you have to say "became" means that this:
>>
>> "It's linked,"
>>
>> ...was bullshit.
>
> Aw... poor wittle baby.
>
> Can't refute, HAS to focus on some off-topic bullshit "you said this" or "you said that" instead of focusing on the
> topic.
>
> One of these days I'll let you win one...
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> ... but not today. LOL
>
> Refute or die!
Since you won't show the study you claim you've found...
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
...how can I?