From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: "I Was Trump?s Ghostwriter. A New Biopic Gets the Most Important Thing Right."
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:21:17 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vem7q8$1ose0$23@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-15 09:55, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vem53u$1ose0$9@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-15 09:25, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vem4k0$1ose0$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-14 20:59, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:51:57 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> But the ones he had he was not allowed to have.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The report literally says the opposite.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Skeeter's correct.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
> >>>>> time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
> >>>> I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
> >>>> where it says that:
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
> >>>
> >>> He is guilty and got away with it.
> >>
> >> That's not what Robert Hur's report says...
> >>
> >> ...but (arguendo) if you're claiming Biden is guilty...
> >>
> >> ...how can you possibly claim Trump is not?
> >
> > I'm not talking about Trump. Why did Joe have documents he wasn't
> > supposed to have?
>
> The Hur report outlines that in great detail.
>
> Why don't you read it. The link is just a few lines above.
>
> :-)
Why don't you just answer?