From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: "I Was Trump?s Ghostwriter. A New Biopic Gets the Most Important Thing Right."
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:53:12 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vemt2g$1svjp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-15 16:02, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vemp0m$1s6om$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-15 11:20, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vem7os$1ose0$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2024-10-15 10:04, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vem60a$1ose0$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2024-10-15 09:24, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vem4g9$1ose0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2024-10-14 20:59, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> "The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
> >>>>>>>>>>> vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> False.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So... CNN is lying?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
> >>>>>>>> Pussey?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Name calling?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For instance:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> But he wasn't lying.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
> >>>>>>>> that's what he based his tweet on.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
> >>>>>>>> have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
> >>>>>>>> wrong.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
> >>>>>> Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
> >>>>>> Hur told them there was nothing there.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
> >>>>
> >>>> How so?
> >>>>
> >>>> Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
> >>>
> >>> Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
> >>
> >> When it comes to politically motivate hearings, it most certainly matters.
> >>
> >> Benghazi: remember that?
> >
> > Yea, when cunt Hillary said "at this point what does it matter" Yea I
> > remember.
>
> Really? Got a cite for that?
>
> I'm betting not.
I already told you I'm not wasting time working for you. You started
snipping and twisting so you're not work the work. I saw her say it.