From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: "I Was Trump?s Ghostwriter. A New Biopic Gets the Most Important
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:38:27 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-15 17:53, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vemt2g$1svjp$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-15 16:02, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vemp0m$1s6om$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-10-15 11:20, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vem7os$1ose0$22@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-10-15 10:04, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vem60a$1ose0$13@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-15 09:24, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vem4g9$1ose0$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-14 20:59, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:35:13 -0700, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "The report found that Biden knew about the classified documents in his home as far back as 2017, when he was no longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> vice president, and that he shared some of the information with a ghostwriter for his memoir published that year."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> False.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So... CNN is lying?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You don't understand the difference between being incorrect and lying,
>>>>>>>>>> Pussey?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Name calling?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For instance:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump's tweet about Dorian was incorrect. What he tweeted was false.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But he wasn't lying.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He didn't lie until he drew black sharpie on a map to pretend that
>>>>>>>>>> that's what he based his tweet on.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In this case, when the report clearly states that Biden was allowed to
>>>>>>>>>> have those documents in his home, if CNN says differently, they got it
>>>>>>>>>> wrong.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
>>>>>>>> Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
>>>>>>>> Hur told them there was nothing there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yea ok. You're so full of shit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How so?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Were the Republicans in charge of the House when those hearings were held?
>>>>>
>>>>> Has it ever mattered who was in charge?
>>>>
>>>> When it comes to politically motivate hearings, it most certainly matters.
>>>>
>>>> Benghazi: remember that?
>>>
>>> Yea, when cunt Hillary said "at this point what does it matter" Yea I
>>> remember.
>>
>> Really? Got a cite for that?
>>
>> I'm betting not.
>
> I already told you I'm not wasting time working for you. You started
> snipping and twisting so you're not work the work. I saw her say it.
You made the claim.
You won't back it.