Davin News Server

['oh.no.this.definitely.is.NOT.going.to.can.politics' psycho gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by commie tip-toeing to suck boyfriend's cock, repaired]

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:26:35 -0700, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport 
letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who 
was *NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as 
me, says... 

> > Not ALL of those that were found.

> *All* of them.

Nope. He took some when he was a Senator.

AND from 2017 to 2021, he wasn't supposed to have ANY of them... right?

Right.

He wasn't VP and he CERTAINLY wasn't President.

WHO said he allowed to KEEP any of them, squirt?

NO ONE.

He stole documents and didn't hand them over when he was NEITHER VP OR President.

THAT is why Trump was indicted. WHERE are the Biden indictments?

> At the time that he came into possession of the documents

And EXACTLY what "time" was that?

> that were found, he was legally and constitutionally authorized to have *all* of 
> them.

No. Not all of them, and he was supposed to give them BACK, you fucking moron.

If Biden was "legally and constitutionally authorized" to have them, then WHY did they indict Trump?

Because he was supposed to give them back, or to the National Archives. Why was Biden allowed to keep them?

He wasn't, stupid.

THAT'S why they took them FROM him. He was NOT allowed to have them. NOT from 2017 to 2021, and he was NOT the 
President when he stole them, so he was NOT allowed to have them at all. 

> At the time Trump *stole* hundreds of boxes of documents, he was not authorized to be in possession of *any* of them.
 
Same as Biden.

Biden stole the documents when he was NOT the President, you fucking moron. EVEN if he was allowed to have had the 
Afghanistan documents, AS a VP, he was no longer VP from 2017 - 2021, so HE was breaking the law... too.

=====

The Narcissistic Semantics-Driven Idiot, Rudy

A friend of mine was telling me recently how she'd been arguing with her husband. This guy is an alcoholic, jobless, 
abusive narcissist and everyone knows she'd be better off without him.

She told me that she found it pointless to tell him anything that was upsetting her because they'd stray from the point 
and just end up talking about her using "the wrong words."

"He always says use the right words... use the right words! So it's just not worth it." It was worth it because he was 
being a dick, but I can see where she's coming from. An argument with a narcissist is always going to be long, 
exhausting, and ultimately pointless. You're never going to get them to see your side of things because half the time 
you stray so far from the point that you can't remember what started the fight.

And it always seems to come down to semantics, what you said vs what you meant.
Semantics

You know what you meant, they know what you meant, and you know they know what you meant. Yet here you are, arguing 
about what you meant. It's infuriating and exhausting, people use the wrong words occasionally. Or maybe there's a more 
appropriate word they could have used. Maybe they were exaggerating, something everyone does, particularly during an 
argument. Most people brush it off as what it was, a mistake or an exaggeration, but not a narcissist. They've got to 
prove their vast linguistic knowledge by picking you up on every little thing you said. It's their way of feeling smug 
and superior whilst attempting to make you look silly.

It's also a way of guiding the argument in a different direction, away from their behavior, onto your choice of words. 
This helps them avoid responsibility for what they did because they knew you'll eventually get tired of arguing about 
nonsense and give up. Then they've won three times, they got away with it, they've stopped the argument and they've 
broken your spirit that little bit more.

Narcissists operate in much the same way as an internet troll who corrects grammar and spelling. They know you're 
making good points and everything you're saying is true, so they've got nothing else to work with. So they pick on your 
choice of words, it's juvenile and transparent, but it's so frustrating that it often works.

It's misdirection in one of its most sinister forms. They're drawing your attention away from what they did and getting 
you to focus on something else.