From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: This How You Can Tell Liberals And Narcissists Are Really Just Lonely Little Boys Who Beg For Attention
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:52:30 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vepgo9$2ei16$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-15 22:22, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:52:43 -0700, Alan says...
> >
> >>>>>>> Dumb ass Ski Bunny thinks "links" can ONLY be html or URL in nature. Nope.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> So what is the nature of the link that you're NOW claiming.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I already told you in a post.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, you didn't.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Look it up.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> URL, html...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Date: 10/09/24 07:00 PM:
> >>>>> In reply to Skeeter:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It was TOO easy for me to find out, not only the study's name, but what was in it, just by following a few links and
> >>>>> WORDS that, when put into a search engine, BECAME links.
> >>>>
> >>>> The fact that you have to say "became" means that this:
> >>>>
> >>>> "It's linked,"
> >>>>
> >>>> ...was bullshit.
> >>>
> >>> Aw... poor wittle baby.
> >>>
> >>> Can't refute, HAS to focus on some off-topic bullshit "you said this" or "you said that" instead of focusing on the
> >>> topic.
> >>>
> >>> One of these days I'll let you win one...
> >
> >>> ... but not today. LOL
> >>>
> >>> Refute or die!
> >
> >> Since you won't show the study you claim you've found...
> >
> > I already have.
> You're just lying now.
He did. You chose to ignore it.