From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: This How You Can Tell Liberals And Narcissists Are Really Just
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:28:10 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-16 17:52, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vepgo9$2ei16$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-15 22:22, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:52:43 -0700, Alan says...
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dumb ass Ski Bunny thinks "links" can ONLY be html or URL in nature. Nope.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what is the nature of the link that you're NOW claiming.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I already told you in a post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, you didn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look it up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> URL, html...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Date: 10/09/24 07:00 PM:
>>>>>>> In reply to Skeeter:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It was TOO easy for me to find out, not only the study's name, but what was in it, just by following a few links and
>>>>>>> WORDS that, when put into a search engine, BECAME links.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact that you have to say "became" means that this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "It's linked,"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...was bullshit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aw... poor wittle baby.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can't refute, HAS to focus on some off-topic bullshit "you said this" or "you said that" instead of focusing on the
>>>>> topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of these days I'll let you win one...
>>>
>>>>> ... but not today. LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> Refute or die!
>>>
>>>> Since you won't show the study you claim you've found...
>>>
>>> I already have.
>> You're just lying now.
>
> He did. You chose to ignore it.
If that's the case, then you can provide the message-id of the post
where he did it.