From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: How Many People Do You Personally Know Who Have Died
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:29:21 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2024-10-16 17:41, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vepilt$2ei16$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>>
>> On 2024-10-15 18:43, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:41:46 -0700, Alan says...
>>>
>>>>> If he was allowed then why was there a hearing?
>>>
>>>> Because the Republicans wanted to keep the issue alive long after Robert
>>>> Hur told them there was nothing there.
>>>
>>> Now, THAT'S bullshit.
>>>
>>> Tell us the law, where Biden was allowed to have documents when he was neither VP NOR President, but Trump wasn't, when
>>> HE was no longer President.
>>
>> Tell us the law that allowed Trump to do the same.
>>
>> The difference is is that when Biden found he still had some classified
>> documents, he cooperated.
>>
>> Trump stonewalled.
>>
>>>
>>> True or false?
>>>
>>> Biden was neither Vice-President OR President from 2017 to 2021?
>>
>> True. So?
>>
>>>
>>> Where does it say, IN THE LAW, that Trump is not allowed to have documents after he's no longer PRESIDENT, but Biden
>>> IS, because he was VP at one time, but not from 2017-2021?
>>
>> There is no such place.
>>
>>>
>>> Biden had FOUR FUCKING YEARS to give back these documents and he did not.
>>
>> Because he didn't know he had them.
>
> Biden was not supposed to have them. He got away with it because of the
> stupid left.
The report says something quite different.
>>
>>>
>>> THAT is the gist of this argument... Biden gets away with the SAME "crime" Trump has BEEN indicted for.
>>
>> "mens rea".
>>
>> Look it up.
>
>
> Did you see Kamalla on Fox? She failed yugely.
>
More deflection means you can't refute what I said.