From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: This How You Can Tell Liberals And Narcissists Are Really Just Lonely Little Boys Who Beg For Attention
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 19:40:54 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vepp7a$2fj4g$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-16 17:52, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vepgo9$2ei16$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-15 22:22, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:52:43 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>> Dumb ass Ski Bunny thinks "links" can ONLY be html or URL in nature. Nope.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So what is the nature of the link that you're NOW claiming.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I already told you in a post.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No, you didn't.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Look it up.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> URL, html...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Date: 10/09/24 07:00 PM:
> >>>>>>> In reply to Skeeter:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It was TOO easy for me to find out, not only the study's name, but what was in it, just by following a few links and
> >>>>>>> WORDS that, when put into a search engine, BECAME links.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The fact that you have to say "became" means that this:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "It's linked,"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...was bullshit.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Aw... poor wittle baby.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can't refute, HAS to focus on some off-topic bullshit "you said this" or "you said that" instead of focusing on the
> >>>>> topic.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One of these days I'll let you win one...
> >>>
> >>>>> ... but not today. LOL
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Refute or die!
> >>>
> >>>> Since you won't show the study you claim you've found...
> >>>
> >>> I already have.
> >> You're just lying now.
> >
> > He did. You chose to ignore it.
>
> If that's the case, then you can provide the message-id of the post
> where he did it.
I already told you when you lost your credibility that I wont fetch for
you.