From: Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Biden Did EXACTLY What Trump Did, But One Is Being Protected And The Other IS Not - Case Closed
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:40:10 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <veppde$2fj82$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
>
> On 2024-10-16 17:46, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vepka0$2eimk$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com says...
> >>
> >> On 2024-10-16 16:53, pothead wrote:
> >>> On 2024-10-16, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:18:08 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Skeeter's correct.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I read that some of the documents Biden stole, he was not supposed to have had, in ANY of his official positions at the
> >>>>>> time he took them and before stealing the election from Trump.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think it was on a CNN site... you can look it up.
> >>>>> I've given you a link to the report, so why don't you just point out
> >>>>> where it says that:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf>
> >>>>
> >>>> Does it address the times he was neither VP or President, or the documents he wasn't supposed to have at all... ever?
> >>>>
> >>>> Then, I don't need to read it.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you're pushing those Afghanistan documents, ONLY, then fuck off. There were FAR many more than just those, and some
> >>>> he wasn't EVER supposed to have.
> >>>>
> >>>> I asked Rudy this and maybe someone else did too, but if Biden was "allowed" to have ALL of the documents, WHY did they
> >>>> take them away, investigate and consider bringing charges, only to "change their minds" because they were protecting
> >>>> him, using the stupid excuse, that he was too far gone MENTALLY to remember WHY he had the documents in the first
> >>>> place.
> >>>>
> >>>> They don't list OPINIONS in those reports, dumb ass, and MUCH of what they were contemplating DID rely on opinion as to
> >>>> how competent Biden was to be indicted and asked question.
> >>>>
> >>>> Have you seen him lately?
> >>>>
> >>>> He's MORE than cogent enough to take questions after being indicted.
> >>>>
> >>>> Biden is being protected and Trump is not.
> >>>>
> >>>> Case closed.
> >>>
> >>> Biden removed documents from the SCIF which is a huge violation.
> >>> Biden was not POTUS when the massive number of documents were taken so
> >>> he had no authority to posses them.
> >>>
> >>> It's that simple.
> >>>
> >>> Whether Trump's authority permitted him to retain the documents he was
> >>> in posession of is a matter of litigation but as POTUS at least he had
> >>> the authority that Joe Biden did not have.
> >> Hur dealt with that.
> >
> > By ignoring it.
>
> Nope. He went into great detail.
>
> You should read the report.
>
> >>
> >> Biden had permission to bring documents to his home.
> >
> > Why did he need "permission" if he didn't know he had them?
> >
> >
>
> He had permission WHEN they were taken home.
>
> Then they got overlooked.
But he said he didn't know he had them. Therefore he wouldn't need
permission.